- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: ESL Debate Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ESL Debate Rubric ESL Debate Rubric Rubric Code: PX7BCB2 By cmarius Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Debate ESL Speaking Rubric
	Developing 1 pts	Basic 2 pts	Standard 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Superior 5 pts
Pronunciation	Developing Student's pronunciation was mainly incomprehensible.	Basic Student's pronunciation made understanding difficult.	Standard Student's pronunciation was understandable with some errors.	Good Student's pronunciation was easy to understand with few errors.	Superior Student's pronunciation was like a native English speaker.
Clarity	Developing Speech was incoherent and incomprehensible for the instructor.	Basic Speech was unclear and difficult for instructor to understand.	Standard Speech unclear and difficult for instructor to understand at times.	Good Speech was unclear at times but was easy to understand.	Superior Speech was clear and very easy to understand.
Fluency	Developing Speech was incomprehensible because of long breaks in-between phrases.	Basic The speech was difficult to follow due to the lack of flow in the speech. Too many very long pauses caused for the listener to have a lack in comprehension ability.	Standard Student communicated some main points fluently but there were 4+ times where the student paused and had difficulty resuming their speech..	Good Student communicated clearly but there were 2+ times when the student paused. Student used some filler words like umm.. and.. uugh.	Superior Students were able to communicate clearly with no difficulty. Student did not have long pauses when speaking. Used fillers like um.. and.. uhh to.
Body Language	Developing Student read all or almost all of the presentation. Student did not engage the audience in any way.	Basic Student read most of the presentation. Student rarely engaged the audience.	Standard Student read some of the presentation and made eye contact sometimes. Student adequately engaged the audience.	Good Student made eye contact much of the time. Student engaged the audience very well.	Superior Student made excellent eye contact with audience. Student completely engaged audience.
Volume	Developing Speech was too quiet to understand what the speaker was saying throughout the entire presentation.	Basic Large sections of the speech were difficult to comprehend due to the speech not being loud enough.	Standard Sometimes it was difficult to hear the speech from the back of the room. There were entire parts of the speech that were not understood.	Good Speech was loud enough but didn't stay loud. There were times where the student lost confidence and their voice lowered.	Superior Speech was communicated with confidence. Student used a clear "teacher voice". Speech could clearly be heard from the back of the room.