- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Engineering - Design Process rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Engineering - Design Process Hazard Control Plan - presentation Students use the engineering design process to design a new medical device or improve an existing one to solve clinical problems or improve life style. Rubric Code: PX7392A By ealdaais Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Design of a Medical Device 100 % Presentation
	Did Not Meet - 0% This point was not covered in the presentation at all (N/A)	Poorly Met - 40% I may have heard something about this point. Their performance was poor (N/A)	Partially Met - 60% This point was mentioned very briefly that I'm still confused about the design. They should have show more efforts (N/A)	Mostly Met - 80% The point was addressed, however it was missing some clarification. They could do better. (N/A)	Fully Met - 100% The point is fully addressed. God Job! (N/A)
Defining the clinical problem 10 % The group defined the clinical problem and mentioned previous solutions and their limitations.	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%
Defining the device 10 % The group defined the device requirements and constraints and their reasonable approaches.	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%
Design visualization 10 % The group have a clear visual structure of their device with clear labels	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%
Human Factors 15 % The group defined the device human factors and considered them in the design	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%
Test & Evaluate 20 % The group are aware of the risks of their design and have several tests to evaluate the validation and verification	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%
FDA report 10 % The group have a clear FDA report	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%
Redesign 5 % The group gave suggestions to their design in order to improve it.	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%
Presentation qulaity 1 10 % Students were able to clearly articulate their understanding of the engineering design process and the effectiveness of their product.	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%
Presentation qulaity 2 10 % All students in the group participated effectively in the presentation	Did Not Meet - 0%	Poorly Met - 40%	Partially Met - 60%	Mostly Met - 80%	Fully Met - 100%