Skip to main content
iRubric: Article Review rubric

iRubric: Article Review rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Article Review 
Article Review
Familiarize yourselves with existing research and theoretical writings pertinent to your topic. Find the best empirical (data-based) article you can that addresses this topic. Describe the article you reviewed, its methods and findings, strengths and weaknesses. Make recommendations for further refining research in this area, including concrete suggestions (e.g., additional theoretical considerations, highlighting relevance of group-specific variables or alternative measures for key constructs) for a possible replication and extension of the study you review.
Rubric Code: PX63WCA
By lgrayshell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Critical Thinking
Enter rubric description
  Below Expectation

Does not meet assignment objectives

1 pts

Meets Expectation

Meets assignment objectives

2 pts

Exceeds Expectation

Exceeds assignment objectives

3 pts

Fully explores topic

Lists methodologies, goals of the study and findings clearly and with pertinent details.
Below Expectation

Substanial inaccuracies in reporting the study methodologies, variables or findings. Elaboration of evidence is insufficient or not understandable to the reader. Basically, an opinon paper with faulty descriptors.
Meets Expectation

Elaborates on study using professional sources, and mentions other viewpoints, but does not clarify or support own views. Writer's perspective is acceptable but not sequentially formatted.
Exceeds Expectation

Elaborates fully on topic acknowledging authors' findings and supports with professional sources/explanations. Has defined the concepts discussed, and uses clear and effective examples.
Raises important questions

The topic posed is only part of the total. Does student find interesting angles from which to explore?
Below Expectation

Fails to raise any important questions related to the topic assigned. Does not meet the criteria of the assignment.
Meets Expectation

Raises questions related to the topic, but may not provide reader with adequate evidence for why these additional questions should be considered.
Exceeds Expectation

Raises important questions relevant to the assiged topic, and answers them with evidence from professional sources.
Logic

Does this paper have a logical opening, supporting evidence, and conclusion?
Below Expectation

Does not follow in a logical format. Difficult for the reader to understand what points are opinion and what points are supportive. Does not convey organized thoughts.
Meets Expectation

Attempts to follow logical format, but with less consistency. Flow of paper may result in confusion between writer's opinions and supportied, evidenced-based reports.
Exceeds Expectation

Answers the questions: Does all this make sense? Does what I say follow the evidence? Can readers discern my opinions from the evidence used to support them?
Shows relevance for statements and evidence.
Spelling, Grammar, Usage

Does student use resources available to ensure grammatical and structural accuracy of the paper?
Below Expectation

Writing mechanics, word usage, grammar and spelling contain many errors that do effect the paper's content.
Meets Expectation

Writing mechanics, word usage, grammar and spelling contains few errors that mostly do not effect the paper's content.
Exceeds Expectation

Writing mechanics, word usage, grammar and spelling contain minimal errors that do not effect the paper's content.
Sources & Citations

Does student demonstrate the proper use of citations and proper reference page?
Below Expectation

No professional sources used or cited, and/or come from an unreliable source. Much of paper is copied from sources, no original work is evident.
Meets Expectation

Use of professional sources without a thoughtful summary as to why the sources are relevant or how they enter into writer's discussion/critique
Exceeds Expectation

Excellent reliability of professional sources. Use of source information within the paper is effective and necessary.



Keywords:
  • critical thinking, evidence based writing

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98