- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: ARTICLE SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ARTICLE SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE ARTICLE SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE A one page summary and critique of an article concerning a current educational trend or issue. Students are required to read the article, summarize the key parts of the article as well as critique the article read. Rubric Code: PX5XX75 By lbakari Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

ARTICLE SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Article Citation	Poor No formal citation has been made.	Fair Formal citation has been stated at the beginning of the assignment, but the referencing style is unclear.	Good Formal citation has been stated at the beginning of the assignment using accurate APA referencing Style.
Article Submission	Poor Article not submitted with the assignment.	Fair Article submitted with the assignment.	Good
Introduction	Poor No introduction has been submitted	Fair The student has identified the overall purpose of the article in a well-conceived topic sentence.	Good
Summary of Article	Poor The student's understanding of the article is so incomplete or has so many misconceptions that the student cannot be said to understand the topic.	Fair The student has a complete understanding of the information in the article that is important but has not included some of the key points into the summary and/or supporting details.	Good The student has a complete and detailed understanding of the article and has highlighted key points as well as appropriate supporting details in the summary section.
Critique of Article	Poor The student does not construct a generalized judgement about the article or constructs one that is not at all supported by the specifics submitted.	Fair The student constructs a generalized judgement about the article that has some relationship to the specifics that have been identified in the article, however, the specifics (content, organization, conclusions) do not totally support the generalization.	Good The student constructs a valid generalized judgement about the article and clearly explains why the judgement is based on specifics (content, organization, conclusions) that have been identified from the article.
Written Communication	Poor The submitted assignment demonstrates little or no attention to the use of necessary conventions of writing(spelling, grammar, organization).	Fair The submitted assignment has moderately communicated efficiently in written form.	Good The student uses all necessary conventions of writing (spelling, grammar, organization) without error or with few errors.