Skip to main content
iRubric: Presidential Candidate Presentation rubric

iRubric: Presidential Candidate Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Presidential Candidate Presentation 
Professional Presentation Evaluation
Rubric Code: PX597B3
By moneal
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Presidential Candidate Presentation
  Fair

1 pts

Poor

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Introduction/Thesis

Fair

Presenter made an attempt to give an introduction of the topic, but the sense of the presentation was lost. The audience struggled to understand the purpose of the presentation.
Poor

Presenter did not give a clear and concise introduction of the topic of the presentation, so the audience was confused about the purpose of the presentation.
Good

Presenter gave a clear introduction of the topic, but the sense of the presentation was vague. The audience for the most part understood the purpose of the presentation.
Excellent

Presenter gave a clear and concise introduction of the topic, so that the audience understood the purpose of the presentation.
Content Development

Fair

Presenter offered some facts but failed to adequately connect how they were important to the topic. Presenter occasionally demonstrated the ability to persuade, demonstrate, inform, etc.
Poor

Presenter failed to give complete facts and some were confusing as to how they supported the topic. Presenter did not demonstrate the ability to persuade, demonstrate, inform, etc.
Good

Presenter gave concise facts and was somewhat complete with explanations of how these facts support the topic. Presenter demonstrated some ability to persuade, demonstrate, inform, etc.
Excellent

Presenter gave clear and concise facts and explanations of how these facts support the topic. Presenter demonstrated the ability to persuade, demonstrate, inform, etc.
Preparation/Organization

Fair

Presenter had some segments that were organized and some that seemed disjointed during delivery of the presentation. The confusion made it difficult for the audience to follow at times.
Poor

Presenter was unorganized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was unclear and confusing to follow.
Good

Presenter was organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was somewhat clear. For the most part it was not confusing to follow.
Excellent

Presenter was extremely organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was clear and concise and easy to follow.
Language

Fair

Presenter occasionally used sentence structures, pronunciation and/or a level of language that distracted the audience from the storyline and complicated ones understanding of the topic.
Poor

Presenter used sentence structures, pronunciation and/or a level of language that detracted from the storyline and did not support the topic.
Good

Presenter used sentence structures, pronunciation and/or language that was mostly appropriate in supporting the storyline and topic.
Excellent

Presenter used sentence structures, pronunciation and/or language that was appropriate in supporting the storyline and topic.
Delivery/Composure

Fair

Presenter exhibited some loss of eye contact, inconsistent voice volume, tone and pacing. Occasional use of distracting and/or inappropriate gestures and movements which detracted from the presentation.
Poor

Presenter exhibited a lack of eye contact, poor voice volume, tone and pacing. Inappropriate gestures and movements detracted from the presentation.
Good

Presenter exhibited some eye contact and good voice volume, tone and pacing. Some use of appropriate gestures and movements that supported the presentation.
Excellent

Presenter exhibited abundance of eye contact. Great voice volume, tone and pacing. Hand gestures and body movements supported the presentation.
Visuals/Media Usage

Fair

Presenter made inappropriate use visuals/media or made choices that were inappropriate in supporting the storyline and topic. Presenters confidence in utilizing selected technology was questionable.
Poor

Presenter made no use visuals/media or made choices that were inappropriate in supporting the storyline and topic. Little confidence in utilizing selected technology was exhibited.
Good

Presenter used visuals/media that was somewhat appropriate in supporting the storyline and topic and exhibited some confidence in utilizing selected technology.
Excellent

Presenter used visuals/media that was appropriate in supporting the storyline and topic and exhibited confidence in utilizing selected technology.
Enthusiasm/Effectiveness

Fair

Presenter was inconsistent in exhibiting enthusiasm, audience's attention showed some disinterest and the purpose for the presentation was only somewhat achieved.
Poor

Presenter was unenthusiastic, audience's attention showed disinterest and the purpose for the presentation was not achieved.
Good

Presenter was somewhat enthusiastic and kept the audience's attention for the most part. The purpose of the presentation was mainly achieved.
Excellent

Presenter was very enthusiastic, kept the attention of the audience the entire time and the purpose of the presentation was achieved.



Keywords:
  • Professional Presentation Evaluation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16