iRubric: Foundations I:Upper School Lobby rubric

The artwork is planned carefully; understanding of all concepts and instructions is clearly shown.<BR>
<BR>
Student has clearly shown growth in skill level and design ability.<BR>
<BR>
Student's artwork is clean there are no stray marks on their paper. They used the clock method correctly. They used perpendicular lines where appropriate. The artwork has been edited to the highest degree of craftsmanship.

The artwork is planned carefully; understanding of most concepts and instructions is shown.<BR>
<BR>
Student has shown some growth in skill level and design ability. <BR>
<BR>
Student did not always use the clock method correctly, or did not use perpendicular lines correctly.

The art work is planned adequately; understanding of some concepts and instructions shown.<BR>
<BR>
Student has shown some growth in skill level and design ability.<BR>
<BR>
There are several areas where the student used the clock method incorrectly.

The artwork shows little evidence of understanding the concepts and instructions.<BR>
<BR>
Student has not shown growth in skill level and design ability.<BR>
<BR>
Student's artwork is not a clear reflection of their understanding of the clock method. There are many perspective mistakes.

The artwork shows no understanding of the concepts and instructions.

Showed many or more different values in color and cross hatching.<BR>
Included a full spectrum of values. <BR>
Textures vary depending on the type of material drawn. There is consideration to tile, metal, and wood materials.

Showed some variety of values in shading.<BR>
Missing some areas of darkest values.<BR>
Missing some areas of light values.<BR>
The textures are somewhat varied but student could do more.

Did not show a variety of values. But there are some value changes. There are very little differences in textures of wood, tile, or other details.

Did not show a variety of values. <BR>
Much of the drawing has not shading on it.<BR>
Much of the drawing is flat, making it all one value

There is very little consideration to value in this work. More attention to detail would have made the artwork better.

Blog is very complete. It shows every stage of the artwork, including a written statement of what happened each day. This is an excellent documentation of the students process and gives the teacher a whole picture of the end result.

Blog was completed on time. The student posted both a written statement and an image. The daily written work did not speak to why students made changes or additions to their piece. But it is a good record.

The blog was created but only images were posted had very few written entries about process.

The student did some blogging but not everyday. The blog has very little written about it. It is not a very good documentation of the daily archive that was assigned.

Student did not do much blogging at all. The blog is spotty with big gaps of time missing. <BR>
Or the student did not blog at all.