Skip to main content
iRubric: GSU-2210-01 Research Experiment & Presentation rubric

iRubric: GSU-2210-01 Research Experiment & Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
GSU-2210-01 Research Experiment & Presentation 
GSU-2210-01 Research Experiment & Presentation
RESEARCH PAPER GUIDELINES The research paper is to be 3-6 pages, double-spaced and must cite a minimum of three academic sources using APA format. RESEARCH PRESENTATION GUIDELINES Each group will be allotted five minutes to present and will be graded on clear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and findings.
Rubric Code: PX35B22
By kolsonpupek
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Research Experiment & Presentation
  Poor

220 pts

Fair

240 pts

Good

265 pts

Excellent

300 pts

Research Methodology
12 %

Poor

Experiment is not a true experiment or quasi-experimental design; absence of theory or hypothesis as basis for research.
Fair

Student is able to correctly identify if research is experiment or quasi-experimental design, but is unable to explain their reasoning; theory and/or hypothesis briefly explained.
Good

Student shows use of resources in explaining reasoning behind experimental design and is able to adequately describe the experimental process; clear explanation of experiment's theory and hypothesis.
Excellent

Student shows logical, thorough understanding of experimental methodology and is able to explain it in an easy to understand manner; hypothesis and experiment based upon psychological topic and/or prior tested theory.
Data Collection & Analysis
12 %

Poor

No explanation of data collection method; absense of research results.
Fair

Unclear approach to data collection; possible bias identified in research results; presumably high "margin of error" in analysis.
Good

Cursory understanding of observation and/or survey method; unbiased evaluation of research results; low "margin of error" probable.
Excellent

Well-informed use of observation and/or survey to collect data; unbiased evaluation of research results; potential "margin of error" accounted for.
Literature Review
12 %

Poor

No academic sources used and/or cited.
Fair

Less than three academic sources used to support research topic and data; substitution of academic sources with basic web research.
Good

Three academic sources used to validate research topic and data.
Excellent

Informative use of three academic sources to substantiate the theory, hypothesis and/or research findings.
Summary of Findings
12 %

Poor

Unreasonable correlations made between data sets; leap of logic to causation, errors of fact or judgment.
Fair

One considerable (and potentially plausible) correlation provided; summary includes leap of logic to causation and/or errors of fact.
Good

One or more plausible correlation between data sets explained; no assuptions regarding causation.
Excellent

Several plausible correlations between data sets clearly explained; assumptions regarding causation avoided; strategic use of charts and illustrations.
Ethics
12 %

Poor

No Informed Consent Provided. No discussion of possible ethical dilemmas.
Fair

Informed consent is vague or incomplete. Ethical discussion is limited and shows little consideration of possible dilemmas.
Good

Informed consent includes relevant details of experiment and rights of participant. Ethical discussion is detailed and shows researcher's understanding of possible ethical dilemmas.
Excellent

Informed consent is thorough and presents information in an easy to understand manner. Ethical discussion includes specific problems related to design and sample. Student shows an understanding of resources related to Ethics.
Conventions, Style & Length
7 %

Poor

Multiple spelling and/or punctuation errors; poor grammar and sentence structure; lack of flow/outline of content; APA style not adhered to; more than one page shorter/longer than 3-6 pages.
Fair

Some spelling and/or punctuation errors; fair grammar and sentence structure; unclear flow/outline of content; inconsistent adherence to APA style; one page shorter/longer than 3-6 pages.
Good

Minor spelling and/or punctuation errors; good grammar and sentence structure; clear flow/outline of content; mostly consistent adherence to APA style; no more than halfpage shorter/longer than 3-6 pages in length.
Excellent

0-2 spelling and/or punctuation errors; excellent grammar and sentence structure; strong flow/outline of content; consistent adherence to APA style; 3-6 pages in length.
In-Class Presentation
33 %

Poor

Unclear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and findings.
Fair

Thorough but unclear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and/or findings.
Good

Clear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and findings.
Excellent

Creative and clear verbal and visual communication of the research, methodology and findings.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98