Skip to main content
iRubric: Star struck Video Rubric

iRubric: Star struck Video Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Star struck Video Rubric 
Presentation Rubric
Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
Rubric Code: PX32464
By JulietK
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8, Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Presentation Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Organisation and Planning

Poor

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. No planning evident.
Fair

Audience has difficulty following presentation because information jumps around. Very little evidence of planning.
Good

Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. It is clear that good planning and organisation has taken place.
Excellent

Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. It is evident that outstanding planning, organisation and time-management has taken place.
Subject Knowledge/Research/Content

Poor

Student does not have grasp of information. Little research and very little content.
Fair

Student is uncomfortable with information and topic. Minimal research has taken place and content is limited.
Good

Student is at ease with content and terms. Information and topic is not foreign to student. It is clear that research has taken place and adequate content has been provided.
Excellent

Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) and understanding of topic, information and terms. It is clear that ample research has taken place. Content is comprehensive, well summarized and interesting.
Graphics

Poor

Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics. Supporting apps have not been used.
Fair

Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation. Pictures are badly chosen. Supporting apps used but not well.
Good

Student's graphics relate to text and presentation. Pictures are well chosen. Tellagami and Popplet have been used although there is room for improvement.
Excellent

Student's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. Pictures are well chosen. Tellagami and Popplet have been very well utilised to put information across.
Following instructions

Poor

Student has not followed instructions.
Fair

The bare minimum has been done in order to comply with requirements. Several steps have been left out or completed in the wrong order.
Good

Instructions have been reasonably well followed with only one or two directions ommitted.
Excellent

All instructions have been followed and learner has made sure that all aspects are included and covered. It is evident that the learners has checked the instructions more than once.
Elocution/volume of voiceovers

Poor

Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.
Fair

Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Good

Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
Excellent

Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Creativity and originality

Poor

No creativity has been used. No original ideas included.
Fair

Learner has attempted to do something slightly different.
Good

Learner has handed in a task which is original and shows efforts at creativity.
Excellent

An exciting and completely 'out-of-the-box' presentation has been hnded in. Ideas are original and very creative. This presentation video stands out from the rest.
Final presentation/Edit process

Poor

No editing has taken place. Errors have been left in video presentation.
Fair

Minimal editing has taken place. Final presentation lacks a 'finished' quality.
Good

Evidence of editing. Little or few errors still in the video presentation.
Excellent

The final presentation is flawless. It is evident that the learner has take great pains to edit their work repeatedly.



Keywords:
  • Presentation

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98