Skip to main content
iRubric: Senior Portfolio Rubric

iRubric: Senior Portfolio Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Senior Portfolio Rubric 
University Learning Senior Criminal Justice Portfolio
Rubric Code: PAXAC3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Preface
  excellent

10 pts

Really Good

9 pts

Fair

7 pts

minimal

5 pts

Peer/Instructor Mark

(N/A)

Ideas/Content

excellent

Has a clear focus and include relevant details and examples, which have been elaborated upon. Reflection centers on learning and subject content. Has made connections across subject areas and with oneself.
Really Good

Has a focus and include details and examples with elaboration. Reflection centers on learning and subject content. Has made some connections across subject areas and with oneself.
Fair

Needs to focus reflection more clearly on learning and subject content. Needs to expand use of details and examples.
minimal

Ideas? You mean I have to think about this?
Peer/Instructor Mark
Organization

excellent

Organizes and links ideas into a logical sequence with an introduction, body and conclusion. Pulls reader into the writing. Uses transitions skillfully. Effectively blends narration and reflection.
Really Good

Organizes ideas into a logical sequence with an introduction, body and conclusion. Uses transitions to link ideas. Blends narration and reflection.
Fair

Attempts to organize ideas into an introduction, body and conclusion. Uses some transitions to link ideas. Tries to blend narration and reflection.
minimal

Organization? Very weak.
Peer/Instructor Mark
Style

excellent

Uses vivid language and a highly effective variety of sentence structures. Maintains a consistent tone and point of view. Voice is reflective.
Really Good

Uses a variety of sentence structures and effective word choice. Maintains a point of view. Voice is reflective.
Fair

Uses imprecise and repetitive word choice. Uses a limited variety of sentences. Tries to maintain a consistent tone. Needs to work on reflective voice.
minimal

Voice? What’s that?
Peer/Instructor Mark
Mechanics x1

excellent

There are very few or no errors in spelling or punctuation.
Work requires little or no editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a good measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Really Good

There are few errors in spelling or punctuation.
Work requires some editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a fair measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Fair

There are some errors in spelling and punctuation.
Work requires a lot of editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are a poor measure of how students met the course learning objectives
minimal

There are many errors in spelling and punctuation.
Work requires significant editing.
Documented content and activities within portfolio are an inadequate measure of how students met the course learning objectives
Peer/Instructor Mark
Conclusion
Ideas/content

excellent

Has a clear focus and include relevant details and examples, which have been elaborated upon. Reflection centers on learning and subject content. Has made connections across subject areas and with oneself.
Includes thoughts about how you have developed during the year and plans for the future.
Includes a challenge for yourself.
Really Good

Has a focus and include details and examples with elaboration. Reflection centers on learning and subject content. Has made some connections across subject areas and with oneself.
Fair

Needs to focus reflection more clearly on learning and subject content. Needs to expand use of details and examples.
minimal

Includes no challenge, or significant reflection on the subject or one own work or future.
Peer/Instructor Mark
Style

excellent

Uses vivid language and a highly effective variety of sentence structures. Maintains a consistent tone and point of view. Voice is reflective.
Really Good

Uses a variety of sentence structures and effective word choice. Maintains a point of view. Voice is reflective.
Fair

Uses imprecise and repetitive word choice. Uses a limited variety of sentences. Tries to maintain a consistent tone. Needs to work on reflective voice.
minimal

Voice? What’s that?
Peer/Instructor Mark
Instructor Use only
Turn in

excellent

On time or early
Really Good

After deadline but still available for peer review.
Fair

Late forcing peer to work late.
minimal

Late forcing peer to work late.
Peer/Instructor Mark

Zero - Not turned in
Peer review

excellent

Provided excellent, very thorough and constructive feedback.
Feedback enabled student to edit and improve their grade.
Really Good

Provided feedback that enabled student to improve grade. Was thorough but not excellent.
Fair

Gave feedback but it was not thorough, not always constructive and/or not much better than editing it themselves.
minimal

Was a little rude, or left huge gaps in the peer review, student is hoping not to get this person again.
Peer/Instructor Mark

Did not do a review for this chapter.
Total Look
Layout

excellent

Excellent

Design is very attractive and shows great creativity.
Consistent format extends from page-to-page; portfolio design is intentional.
The portfolio demonstrates careful thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out so as not to waste space or appear too crowded.
Really Good

Design is attractive and shows some creativity.
Some inconsistencies in format page-to-page; portfolio design appears intentional
The portfolio demonstrates some thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out with some wasted space or appear somewhat crowded.
Fair

Design is somewhat attractive and shows little creativity.
Somewhat consistent format from page-to-page; portfolio design appears fairly random.
The portfolio demonstrates little thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out wasting some space &/or appear crowded.
minimal

Design is unattractive and shows no creativity.
Inconsistent format from page-to-page; portfolio design is random
The portfolio demonstrates no thought about the order in which information is presented.
The pages are laid out to waste space &/or appear too crowded.
Peer/Instructor Mark

Extra points for Print Ready Books
Contents

excellent

Contains all the elements of the final project:
1-Cover
2-Dedication
3-Title Page
4-Preface
5-Table of Contents
6-Chapters
7-Conclusion
8-Work Cited
Really Good

Missing one element
Fair

missing 2 elements
minimal

Missing 3 or more elements
Peer/Instructor Mark





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16