Skip to main content
iRubric: Socratic Seminar--Rubric

iRubric: Socratic Seminar--Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Socratic Seminar--Rubric 
Socratic Seminar--Rubric
NOTE: You will be graded not on how often you participate, but the WAY in which you participate. You must LISTEN to each other, ask questions, cite the text, keep the discussion going, and offer insight. Note also that you can earn participation points by using your white board in the outer circle.
Rubric Code: PAC6W4
By silverrose62379
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric ELACC1SL1, & SL3 & SL4
  Superior Discussion

33 pts

Great Discussion

28 pts

Good Discussion

25 pts

Average Discussion

24 pts

Poor Discussion

20 pts

Group

Superior Discussion

Entire class participates evenly and enthusiastically in the discussion. All members contribute insight today. Students shared the floor, encouraged each other, and asked thoughtful and insightful questions which kept the discussion at a high level.
Great Discussion

Entire class participates fairly evenly and enthusiastically in the discussion. All members contribute something important today. Students shared the floor, encouraged each other, and asked l questions which kept the discussion moving.
Good Discussion

Entire class participates but somewhat unevenly and enthusiastically in the discussion. All members contributed today. Students did not always share the floor, encourage each other, and ask questions.
Average Discussion

Entire class did not participate in the discussion. A few members did not contribute at all to the discussion or made irrelevant, vague comments. Students did not always share the floor, encourage each other, and ask questions.
Poor Discussion

Entire class did not participate in the discussion. Many members failed to contribute today. Students did not share the floor, encourage each other, and ask questions. Discussion was monopolized by one or two class members. many students were silent.
Individual

Superior Discussion

Offers many contributions. Comments are insightful and show a high level of understanding and clear evidence of reading. Comments move discussion to a higher level, are interesting, and analytical. Asks thoughtful questions. Outer circle notes are excellent. White board comments are relevant and insightful.
Great Discussion

Offers several contributions. Shows evidence of reading and a solid understanding of the text. Comments move discussion forward and are interesting. Asks questions, seeks clarification from others. Outer circle notes are good. White board comments are relevant and interesting.
Good Discussion

Offers a few contributions. Comments show an acceptable level understanding. Comments are a little vague and could be more insightful. Does not asks questions. Acceptable outer circle notes. White board comments are relevant.
Average Discussion

Rarely 0ffers contributions and shows a weak understanding of text and or maybe weak preparation. Comments are vague and/or need more evidence of critical thinking. Fails to ask questions, seek clarification. Outer circle notes lacking. White board participation lacking.
Poor Discussion

Fails to offer any contributions or shows poor understanding of the text and indicates a lack of preparation. Comments are vague and show little evidence of careful reading. Fails to ask questions, seek clarification. No outer circle notes. No white board participation.
Individual

Superior Discussion

Cites clear, convincing evidence and specific support for observations, quoting the text each time.
Great Discussion

Cites solid evidence and specific support for observation, directly quoting the text several times.
Good Discussion

Cites evidence and specific support for observation, directly quoting the text at least once.
Average Discussion

Offers specific examples for support of observations, but does not directly quote the text.
Poor Discussion

Student does not use text during seminar; does not support assertions; responses are vague. Or student does not have text today.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16