Skip to main content
iRubric: Student Council Interview rubric

iRubric: Student Council Interview rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Student Council Interview 
FMS Student Council Interview
2019-2020 Membership
Rubric Code: NXCC8XW
By cclark34
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Faiss Middle School
Students Council Application Interviews
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Total

0 pts

Comment/Notes

0 pts

Position

Excellent

Candidate knows the responsibilities associated with the position and clearly understands the commitment and responsibility needed.
Good

Candidates knows some about the position, commitment and responsibility needed.
Fair

Candidate knows little about the position and does not understand the commitment or responsibility needed.
Poor

Candidate knows nothing about the position and clearly does not understand the commitment or responsibility needed.
Total
Comment/Notes
First Impressions

Excellent

Candidate would fit in very well with the environment of Leadership class.

Candidate is dressed to
show school spirit or has
dressed up.
Good

Candidate would need some adjustment time, but could fit in with the environment of Leadership class.

Candidate is dressed in
casual day to day attire.
Fair

Candidate would struggle in the environment of Leadership class.
Poor

Candidate would not do well in Leadership class.

Candidate is dressed
way below what is expected.
Total
Comment/Notes
Preparation

Excellent

Candidate was definitely prepared to answer questions from the panel.

It is obvious that the Candidate has put time and thought into his or her answers.
Good

Candidate seemed mostly prepared to answer questions from the panel.

The candidate has put some time and thought into his or her answers
Fair

Candidate seemed barely prepared to answer the questions from the panel.

The candidate does not have well thought out answers.
Poor

Candidate was not prepared to answer the questions from the panel.

The candidate has put no time and thought into his or her answers.
Total
Comment/Notes
General Attitudes

Excellent

Candidate is energetic and is genuinely interested in the position.
Good

Candidate is passive and seems interested or is overly enthusiastic of the position.
Fair

Candidate is neutral and shows little enthusiasm in the position.
Poor

Candidate shows a lack of interest in the position.
Total
Comment/Notes
Response

Excellent

The candidate is very knowledgeable in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she demonstrates full knowledge by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration
Good

The candidate is somewhat knowledgeable in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she demonstrates little knowledge by answering the questions with some explanations.
Fair

The candidate has little knowledge in the responsibilities of a Student Council member. He or she does not provide explanations.
Poor

Candidate seems to have no knowledge in the responsibilities of a Student Council member.
Total
Comment/Notes
Quality

Excellent

Answers reflect outstanding professional depth and quality. Candidate will be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.

Conversation is engaging.
Good

Answers reflect adequate professional depth and quality. Candidate will most likely be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.

Conversation is good.
Fair

Answers reflect average depth and quality. Candidate will not likely be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.

Conversation is sub par.
Poor

Answers did not reflect depth or quality. Candidate will not be a strong voice or leader for his or her position.

Conversation is dull.
Total
Comment/Notes
Closing

Excellent

Candidate showed
extreme interest in
becoming a member of Student Council.

Candidate asked
appropriate questions.

Candidate thanked the interviewers.
Good

Candidate did show
some interest in becoming a member of Student Council.

Candidate did not ask any questions.

Candidate thanked the interviewers.
Fair

Candidate did show
some interest in becoming a member of Student Council.

Candidate forgot to either ask questions about council or did not thank the interviewers.
Poor

Candidate did not show
any interest in becoming a member of Student
Council.
Candidate did not ask any questions.
Candidate did not thank
the interviewers.
Total
Comment/Notes
Overall

Excellent

Candidate would be an essential component to Student Council.
Good

Candidate would make a good student council executive.
Fair

Candidate would be a fair student council executive.
Poor

Candidate would be detrimental to the effectiveness of Student Council.
Total

Grand Total
Comment/Notes



Keywords:
  • Student Council Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98