Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Lifespan Interview Paper rubric

iRubric: Lifespan Interview Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Lifespan Interview Paper Rubric Code: NX97827 By AMoore5489 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Lifespan Interview Paper Enter rubric description
	Poor 3 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Overall Writing Appropriate writing structure, grammar, spelling and length	Poor Paper is not in essay format, and instead is bulleted or utilizes other incomplete formatting styles. Multiple grammar and spelling errors throughout the paper. Paper is 1-2 pages long.	Fair Paper is written in appropriate essay format, though still has errors in structuring, paragraphs, etc. Fewer grammar and spelling errors, though they still exist throughout the assignment. Paper is 3-4 pages long.	Good Paper is written in appropriate essay format with minimal errors. Very few grammar and spelling errors throughout the entire document. Paper is 4-5 pages long.	Excellent Appropriate writing structure and format, with next to no grammatical or spelling errors. Paper is 5-7 pages long.
Interview Summary: Introduction Enter description	Poor Introduction includes very little relevant information about the interviewee, and does not introduce the purpose of the assignment	Fair Introduction includes some information about the interviewee, but not the most imperative (such as age and gender.) . Introduction briefly touches upon the purpose of the assignment, but does not explain with any depth.	Good Introduction includes most of the relevant information about the interviewee, but is missing some components (such as how the interviewer knows them) and/or introduction does not fully explain the purpose of the assignment and tie all of this together for the reader.	Excellent This section fully introduces the interviewee to the reader, and includes all appropriate information including their gender, age, first name only, and any other pertinent demographic information (for ex., religion, where they grew up, SES, educational level, etc.) Introduction also serves to orient the reader to the purpose of the assignment
Enter Title
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Good 15 pts	Excellent 25 pts
Interview Summary: Introduction Enter description	Poor Student included very little information about the interview, and did not touch upon important parts of the experience. Student leaves the reader with little to no indication of what the interview experience was like.	Fair Student begins to describe the interview process, and gives the reader somewhat of a "feel" for their interviewee, however leaves much to the imagination. highlights only 1-2 important parts of the interview, and does not pull them together into a cohesive story.	Good Student crafts a story of their interviewee, and highlights appropriate parts of the interview to do so, but does not synthesize this information fully enough in their own words. May leave out 1-2 of the most important components of the interview.	Excellent This section provides the reader with a strong "feeling" of what the interview experience was like. Student chose appropriate questions/and or components of the interview to highlight that provided some of the most important information obtained. Student did not try to include ALL information, but touched upon what was most relevant.
Enter Title
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Good 20 pts	Excellent 40 pts
Integration and Application	Poor Student selects 0-1 concepts from class/textbook/lecture that are exemplified as a real life example in their interview. Student writes very little on the concept they do choose. Student does not connect how their interviewee's responses illustrate the concept.	Fair Student selects 1-2 concepts from class/textbook/lecture that are exemplified as a real life example in their interview. Student writes less that 1 paragraph on the concepts they choose. Student attempts to connect how their interviewee's responses illustrate the concept, but struggles to effectively do so, and provides no interpretation of their own.	Good Student selects 2-3 concepts from class/textbook/lecture that are exemplified as a real life example in their interview. Student writes 1 paragraph on each of the concepts they choose. Student successfully connects how their interviewee's responses illustrate the concept, but provides little to no interpretation of their own.	Excellent Student selects 4 or more concepts we have discussed from the textbook that are exemplified as a real life example in their interview. Student writes 1-2 paragraphs defining each concept and explicitly connects how their interviewees responses illustrate the concept. Student offers their own interpretation of your subjects’ responses
Enter Title
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 8 pts	Good 12 pts	Excellent 15 pts
Interview and Supplemental Material	Poor The papers suggests that the interview either did not occur, or was very brief and rushed. If a transcript is provided, it is far too short, or does not include word for word transcription.	Fair The paper suggests the interview was of appropriate length, but there is missing content. Transcript is partially word for word, but includes a good amount of paraphrased information.	Good The paper suggests that the interview included all appropriate content. Transcript is provided, but is vastly word-for-word with only 1-2 noticeable paraphrases or areas in which the content was not verbatim.	Excellent Through both the paper as well as the transcript, it is clear that the student conducted an appropriate, full interview. Transcript is provided and is vastly word for word.

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Psychology rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98