- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: WRH325 : This WCU Life Podcast rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
WRH325 : This WCU Life Podcast WRT 120: This I Believe Podcast & Paper This essay should follow the guidelines provided by NPR's "This American Life" Project and should adhere to the guidelines mentioned in class. Rubric Code: NX7BBW4 By schmidtp Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Podcast
	Excellent 14 pts	Good 12 pts	Poor 10 pts
Group Feedback	Excellent All group members contributed in an equitable way.	Good Group dynamic is uneven.	Poor Individual member does not contribute constructively to the group.
Planning Process	Excellent Group members are prepared and productive during the workshop time.	Good Group members are somewhat prepared and/or productive during the workshop time.	Poor Group members seem unfocused and/or unproductive during the workshop time.
Question Quality	Excellent Questions are open and thought out in a logical order.	Good Questions seem randomly ordered.	Poor Questions are closed - OR questions are simply formulated.
Content Quality	Excellent Raw data is shaped into an interesting & coherent narrative.	Good The data is present, but lacks finesse.	Poor Podcast is just raw data pieced together without any evidence of additional attention.
Number of Voices	Excellent It's clear that all group members had a hand in the final product.	Good It's not immediately obvious that all group members had a hand in the final product.	Poor Product only has evidence of one-two group members.
Delivery - Podcast	Excellent Speaker's voice consistently shows interest and emotion to complement the written component.	Good Speaker's voice inconsistently shows interest and emotion to complement the written component.	Poor Speaker's voice is monotone and lacks any emotional connection to the material.
Editing - Podcast	Excellent High quality audio representation during voice and transition segments.	Good There are minor lapses in the product's quality.	Poor The podcast is of poor technical quality.