Digital Storytelling
Enter rubric description
|
|
|
Poor
1 pts
|
Fair
2 pts
|
Good
3 pts
|
Very Good
4 pts
|
Excellent
5 pts
|
|
|
Project contains none of the following: audio, video, images.
Project shows minimal use of digital skills.
Student did not complete a storyboard prior to completion.
Project may be incomplete.
|
Project contains only 1 of the following: audio, video, images.
The multimedia components add to the story minimally.
Project shows improvement of digital skills.
Student did not complete a storyboard prior to completion.
|
Project contains at least 2 of the following: audio, video, images.
The multimedia components add to the story somewhat.
Project shows improvement of digital skills.
Student did not complete a storyboard prior to completion.
|
Project contains at least 2 of the following: audio, video, images.
The multimedia components add to the story somewhat.
Project shows adequate digital skills.
Student completed a storyboard prior to completion.
|
Project contains at least 2 of the following: audio, video, images.
The multimedia components add to the story well.
Project shows mastery of digital skills.
Student completed a storyboard prior to completion.
|
|
|
Story is missing clear beginning, middle, or end.
Project has several mechanics errors.
Student used poor word choice.
Student used repetitive sentence structure.
Plot is not developed.
Project may be incomplete.
References are not included.
|
Story is missing clear beginning, middle, or end.
Project has more than 6 mechanics errors.
Student used fair word choice.
Student used repetitive sentence structure.
Plot is minimally developed.
References are not included.
|
Story contains vague beginning, middle, and end.
Project has more than 3 mechanics errors.
Student used good word choice.
Student used some varied sentence structure.
Plot is somewhat developed.
Correct references included.
|
Story contains obvious beginning, middle, and end.
Project has fewer than 3 mechanics errors.
Student used good word choice.
Student used some varied sentence structure.
Plot is fairly well developed.
Correct references included.
|
Story contains obvious beginning, middle, and end.
Project has no mechanics errors.
Student used excellent word choice.
Student used varied sentence structure.
Plot is well developed.
Correct references included.
|
|
|
Project is obviously not student's original work.
Design elements detract from the presentation or are irrelevant.
Ideas show little creativity.
|
Project displays work that may not be original.
Design elements detract from the presentation or are irrelevant.
Ideas show little creativity.
|
Project displays student's original work.
Design elements detract from the presentation or are irrelevant.
Ideas are somewhat creative.
|
Project displays student's original work.
Design elements do not enhance the presentation.
Ideas are creative and inventive.
|
Project displays student's original work.
Design elements enhance the presentation.
Ideas are creative and inventive.
|
|
|
Project shows very little understanding of the mystery genre.
Project contains only one or two of the following: a well defined mystery, evidence, suspects, a red herring, a sleuth.
There is a vague or no resolution to the mystery.
|
Project shows little understanding of the mystery genre.
Project contains three of the following: a well defined mystery, evidence, suspects, a red herring, a sleuth.
There is a vague or no resolution to the mystery.
|
Project shows some understanding of the mystery genre.
Project contains three of the following: a well defined mystery, evidence, suspects, a red herring, a sleuth.
Mystery is solved by the end.
|
Project shows good understanding of the mystery genre.
Project contains four of the following: a well defined mystery, evidence, suspects, a red herring, a sleuth.
Mystery is solved by the end.
|
Project shows complete understanding of the mystery genre.
Project contains all of the following: a well defined mystery, evidence, suspects, a red herring, a sleuth.
Mystery is solved by the end.
|