- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Mindmapping Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Mindmapping Project Mindmapping Project Mindmapping Project for Theology II Rubric Code: NX329CB By afichera Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Humanities Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Cold War Mindmap 100 %
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Creativity 25 %	Poor No creativity at all in the development of the mindmap. The layout reveals that little time was spent on the project.	Fair The mimdmap displays little creativity. The layout is somewhat confusing and hard to follow.	Good The mindmap contains some creativity. The layout is logical and presented well.	Excellent The mindmap contains a variety of creative components: sound, video, images, links etc. In addition the layout of the mindmap is visually stimulating and enhances the overall presentation.
Content Quality 45 %	Poor Basic level of research. The presentation seems to veer off of the topic inserting non essentials to the research.	Fair The content is not necessarily collegiate level. Some research is indicated, however the research is not based on academic sources. The content does not adequately portray the topic of Christology or Soteriology	Good The content is collegiate level. Some research is indicated in the presentation. The project shows adequate information on the topic as it relates to Christology or soterioloy.	Excellent The content of the mindmap is collegiate level and indicates extensive research on the topic. In addition, the presentation is informative and relevant to the topic of Christology or Soteriology. The mindmap exceeds the minimum of six branches and three subtopics under each under each branch
Critical Thinking 30 %	Poor Little or no critical engagement with the material presented in the mindmap.	Fair The critcal thinking component of the mindmap is not adequate. The subtopics and links provided show critical engagement with the topic in at least three different sections.	Good The critical thinking evident in the mindmap is adequate and relevant. The subtopics and links provided show critical engagement with the topic in at least four different sections.	Excellent The mindmap indicates advanced level of critical thinking. The subtopics and links provided show critical engagement with the topic in at least five different sections.