Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Rubric: French 2 - Video Project
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Rubric: French 2 - Video Project
Rubric: French 2 - Video Project
This rubric is for a French video assessment in which students present vocabulary and grammar concepts from Ch. 12. Their video must be between 3 1/2 and 4 1/2 minutes and demonstrate comprehension of both reflexive verbs and vocabulary related to daily routines. Both the video and transcript must be shared online no later than Friday, April 25.
Rubric Code:
NCC59W
By
eslsensei
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Performance Rubric
100 %
Poor1-2
(N/A)
Fair3-5
(N/A)
Good-6-8
(N/A)
Excellent-9-10
(N/A)
1. Pronunciation
Poor1-2
Student pronounced 7 or more words incorrectly, with little effort for correction.
Fair3-5
Student pronounced 5-6 words incorrectly, with some effort for correction.
Good-6-8
Student pronounced 3-4 words incorrectly, with some effort for correction.
Excellent-9-10
Student pronounced 0-2 words incorrectly, with great effort for correction.
2. Use of vocabulary words
Poor1-2
Students used less than 10 vocabulary words throughout the skit.
Fair3-5
Students used less than 15 vocabulary words throughout the skit.
Good-6-8
Students used less than 20 vocabulary words throughout the skit.
Excellent-9-10
Students used less than 25 vocabulary words throughout the skit.
3. Grammar
Poor1-2
Student had 8 or more grammar points used incorrectly throughout the skit, with little effort for correction.
Fair3-5
Student had 6-7 grammar points used incorrectly throughout the skit, with little or some effort for correction.
Good-6-8
Student had 4- 5 grammar points used incorrectly throughout the skit, with some effort for correction.
Excellent-9-10
Students had less than 3 grammar points used incorrectly throughout the skit, with great effort for correction.
4. Fluency
Poor1-2
Student presented a below average demonstration of French fluency. Student stumbled over words and missed or confused lines multiple times. Student's use of note-cards for lines was obvious. It appeared student did not understand what he/she was saying.
Fair3-5
Student presented an average demonstration of French fluency. Student stumbled over words and missed or confused lines more than 3 times. Student had to use note-cards for lines often. Student's intonation/expression was often inappropriate.
Good-6-8
Student presented an average demonstration of French fluency. Student stumbled over words at times and confused lines two or less times. Student had to use note cards for lines often. Student's intonation indicating an understanding of what he/she was saying.
Excellent-9-10
Student presented an average to above average performance. Student had few to no issues with fluency.
5. Props
Poor1-2
Students used 0-1 props in their skit and/or props did not contribute to the performance.
Fair3-5
Students used 2 props and most contributed to the understanding of the performance.
Good-6-8
Students used 3-4 props and most contributed to the understanding of the performance.
Excellent-9-10
Students used 5 or more props and all contributed to the performance making the skit very entertaining!
6. Effort and Attitude
Poor1-2
The student put little to no effort into the skit and the group grade suffered because of attitude.
Fair3-5
The student could have done more to contribute and/or was not showing enthusiasm in front of the class.
Good-6-8
The student could have done more to contribute and/or, however was showing enthusiasm in front of the class.
Excellent-9-10
The student was excited and ready to present with a smile! The group benefited from this member!
7. Creativity
Poor1-2
The students presented little creativity in their skit.Students worked together poorly, video was late, preparation was unorganized, and/or took away from the overall quality of the work
Fair3-5
The student's presentation was a little creative, room for improvement.<BR>
Students worked together , video was on time, preparation was unorganized, and/or took away from the overall quality of the work
Good-6-8
The student's presentation was creative and unique, however had room for improvement.<BR>
Students worked together with little or no problems, video was on time, and/or organization was lacking but acceptable.
Excellent-9-10
The student's work was very creative and unique!
8. Transcript
Poor1-2
No transcript
Fair3-5
transcript was incomplete and evidenced minimal effort.
Good-6-8
transcript was almost complete, but missing some critical elements. Evidence of concerted effort.
Excellent-9-10
Complete transcript with all dialogue and vocabulary well written with minimal errors.
9. Video Length
Poor1-2
Video was not submitted
Fair3-5
Video is less than 3.5 minutes and does not cover a full day.
Good-6-8
Video may meet the required length, and/or has gaps missing in the day.
Excellent-9-10
Video is 3.5-4.5 minutes long and
10. Deadline
Poor1-2
Student did not meet the deadline, seek out help, or communicate needs.
Fair3-5
Good-6-8
Excellent-9-10
Student met the deadline.
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.