Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Disaster Psychology Group Presentation rubric

iRubric: Disaster Psychology Group Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Disaster Psychology Group Presentation Disaster Psychology Group Presentation Disaster Psychology Group Presentation Rubric Code: NCBAC9 By merilederer Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Outstanding 4 pts
Detailed description of the event Including scope of damage	Poor Addressed this issue very minimally.	Fair Gave a brief, superficial description of the event and the scope of the damage.	Good Gave a comprehensive description of the event and the scope of the damage.	Outstanding Gave an in-depth description of the event and the scope of the damage.
Historical, political analysis Historical or political context and possible legal or political consequences	Poor Addressed this issue very minimally.	Fair Gave a brief, superficial description of the historical, political context and/or the legal or political consequences.	Good Gave a comprehensive analysis of the historical, political context as well as mentioning the legal or political consequences.	Outstanding Gave an in-depth analysis of the historical, political context as well as a discussion on the legal or political consequences.
Pre-impact preparedness What, if any, were the preimpact strategies and what preparedness measures were in place	Poor Addressed this issue very minimally.	Fair Gave a brief, superficial description of the preimpact strategies and/or preparedness (or lack of preparedness) measures the community.	Good Gave a comprehensive description of the preimpact strategies and preparedness (or lack of preparedness) of the community.	Outstanding Provided an in-depth description of the preimpact strategies and preparedness (or lack of preparedness) of the community.
Logisitical challenges What were the challenges during preimpact and response	Poor Addressed this issue very minimally.	Fair Briefly and superficially discussed the logistical challenges faced or overcome during the preimpact and response phases.	Good Gave a comprehensive discussion of the logistical challenges faced or overcome during the preimpact and response phases.	Outstanding Gave an in-depth discussion of the logistical challenges faced or overcome during the preimpact and response phases.
Populations How many people were impacted? Who were the vulnerable populations? What cultural or religious issues needed to be addressed?	Poor Addressed this issue very minimally.	Fair Briefly and superficially discussed the populations impacted. Made slight reference to vulnerable populations and/or cultural and/or religious issues.	Good Comprehensively discussed the populations impacted. Discussed vulnerable populations in some depth and discussed cultural and religious issues.	Outstanding Gave an in-depth discussion on the population impact. This discussion included vulnerable populations as well as cultural and religious issues.
Mental health consequences What were the overriding mental health issues and how were they addressed?	Poor Addressed this issue very minimally.	Fair Briefly and superficially discussed mental health issues of survivors.	Good Gave a comprehensive overview of the mental health issues of the survivors.	Outstanding Gave an in-depth analysis of the mental health issues of the survivors.
Other relevant characteristics What else occurred that may have influenced survivors' reactions?	Poor Addressed this issue very minimally.	Fair Briefly and superficially discussed other relevant characteristics that may have influenced survivors' reactions.	Good Discussed other relevant characteristics that may have influenced survivors' reactions.	Outstanding Discussed, in some detail, other relevant characteristics that may have influenced survivors' reactions.
References/Sources	Poor Referenced 1-2 sources.	Fair Referenced 3 sources.	Good Referenced 4 sources.	Outstanding Referenced 5 or more sources.
Presentation Clarity and organization of presentation	Poor Presentation was minimally organized and clear.	Fair Presentation was somewhat organized and clear.	Good Presentation was organized, clear and held the listeners' interest.	Outstanding Presentation was extremely organized, clear and interesting.

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Psychology rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16