- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Teacher Case Analysis Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Teacher Case Analysis Rubric Rubric Code: NA9A9C By educw200student Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Case Information
	Missing 0 pts	Inclomplete 2 pts	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Case Information	Missing No submission.	Inclomplete The case information has not been fully completed. Items in the case have not been highlighted.	Poor Many of the parts of the case is incomplete or missing. Only little key information is highlighted.	Fair Some of the parts of the case is incomplete or missing. These include two or more of the following three areas: the Case information is not finished, they did not copy paste the Case, they did not highlight areas of the case.	Good Case information is complete. Most key information is highlighted.	Excellent Case information is complete, which includes summarizing the case in the space provided. The key case information is highlighted.
Step I. Standards & Needs
	Missing 0 pts	Inclomplete 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Enter TitleInstructional Goals	Missing	Inclomplete Only few instructional goals to achieve the standard are identified. The goals are not thoroughly and accurately stated.	Poor Some important instructional goals to achieve the standard are missing.	Fair Most instructional goals to achieve the standard are identified. Some identified goals are not thoroughly and accurately stated.	Good Most instructional goals to achieve the standard are identified. All the identified goals are not thoroughly and accurately stated.	Excellent Sufficient instructional goals to achieve the standard are identified. The goals are thorough and accurate to achieve the standards.
Classroom Facts	Missing	Inclomplete None of the facts about learners and environments in the case are listed thoroughly and accurately.	Poor Only few facts about learners and environments in the case are listed thoroughly and accurately.	Fair Several facts about learners and environments in the case are listed thoroughly and accurately.	Good Most of the facts about learners and environments in the case are listed thoroughly and accurately.	Excellent All of the facts about learners and environments in the case are listed thoroughly and accurately.
Problems	Missing	Inclomplete Only few problems/difficulties are identified. But they are not explained clearly. Problem descriptions are poorly described and illogical.	Poor Only a few problems/difficulties are identified and explained clearly. Problem descriptions are poorly described and illogical.	Fair Most of the problems/difficulties are identified. But they are not explained clearly. Problem descriptions are relatively simple but covers the major points.	Good Most problems/difficulties are identified and explained clearly. Problem descriptions exhibit good understanding of the case.	Excellent All problems/difficulties are identified and explained clearly. Problem descriptions exhibit thorough and reasonable understanding of the case.
Step II. Technology Options
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Technology Options	Missing	Incomplete None of the technology options are strongly relevant to its corresponding problems/difficulties.	Poor Only a few technology options are strongly relevant to its corresponding problems/difficulties.	Fair Technology options are somewhat relevant to the corresponding problems/difficulties.	Good Most technology options are strongly relevant to its corresponding problems/difficulties.	Excellent All technology options are strongly relevant to its corresponding problems/difficulties.
Number of Options	Missing	Incomplete Less than five specific tools/resources per student are listed properly.	Poor Six or seven specific tools/resources per student are listed. Only one option is provided for some problems. There are more than 5 broken links.	Fair Eight specific tools/resources per student are listed.Only one option is provided for some problems. Or there are broken links.	Good Nine specific tools/resources per student are listed. There are one or two broken links.	Excellent Minimum of ten specific tools/resources per student are listed properly and at least two options are provided for each problem/difficulty identifies. Link to each option is given
Description	Missing	Incomplete The description does not specifically and sufficiently explain the features of the technology option to solve the problem in achieving the corresponding instructional goal.	Poor Only a few of the descriptions provide specific and sufficient explanations of the features of the technology option to solve the problem in achieving the corresponding instructional goal.	Fair Only about half of the descriptions provide specific and sufficient explanations of the features of the technology option to solve the problem in achieving the corresponding instructional goal.	Good Most descriptions specifically and sufficiently explain the feature of the technology option to solve the problem in achieving the corresponding instructional goal.	Excellent The description specifically and sufficiently explains the feature of the technology option to solve the problem in achieving the corresponding instructional goal. These are thorough descriptions.
Step III. What (did you select), Wh
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Instruction - Alignment	Missing	Incomplete Instructional goals, technology options, and justification for choosing the option weakly align. Justifications for choosing the options and how the selected technology aligns with instructional goals are unreasonable.	Poor Instructional goals, technology options, and justification for choosing the option weakly align. Justifications for choosing the options and how the selected technology aligns with instructional goals are somewhat unreasonable.	Fair Instructional goals, technology options, and justification for choosing the option align. Justifications for how the selected technology aligns with instructional goals are drawn from elsewhere in the document.	Good Instructional goals, technology options, and justification for choosing the option align well. Justifications for how the selected technology aligns with instructional goals are understandable.	Excellent Instructional goals, technology options, and justification for choosing the option align well. Justifications for how the selected technology aligns with instructional goals are convincing.
Justification - Use of 3 e's - Sig	Missing	Incomplete Justification was not discussed based on the 3 e’s.	Poor Justification was discussed based on the 3 e’s. E’s were discussed with inappropriate rationales	Fair Justification was discussed based on the 3 e’s. E’s were discussed with rationales, but they do not provide in-depth understanding of the 3 E’s. (i.e., mostly re-using vocabulary used in the lecture)	Good Justification was discussed based on the 3 e’s. Significant e’s were discussed with appropriate rationales.	Excellent Justification was discussed based on the 3 e’s. Significant e’s were discussed with convincing rationales.
Step IV. Step-By-Step
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Sequence	Missing	Incomplete The instructional sequence will not work and a substitute teacher would have major difficulties following the instructions.	Poor The instructional sequence probably will not work and a substitute teacher would have difficulty following the instructions.	Fair The instructional sequence will may work and a substitute teacher may have some difficulty following the instructions.	Good The instructional sequence will work and a substitute teacher would be able to follow the instructions.	Excellent The instructional sequence will work well and a substitute teacher would be able to easily follow the instructions.
Revisiting problems
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Revisiting Problems	Missing	Incomplete The problem is somewhat restated (the problem was not correct in the first place). AND The explanation does not describes how the selected options address the problem(s).	Poor The problem is somewhat restated (the problem was not correct in the first place). AND The explanation describes how the selected options address the problem(s) somewhat.	Fair The problem is somewhat restated (the problem needs to be correct in the first place). AND The explanation describes how the selected options address the problem(s) with some detail.	Good The problem is correctly restated (the problem needs to be correct in the first place). AND The explanation describes how the selected options address the problem(s) with detail.	Excellent The problem is correctly restated (the problem needs to be correct in the first place). AND The explanation describes how the selected options address the problem(s) with great detail.
Communication with Teacher
	Missing 0 pts	Incomplete 2 pts	Poor 4 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Communication with Teacher	Missing	Incomplete Did not communicate with teacher enough to obtain enough information.	Poor Communicated with teacher, but was unorganized and was not diligent in his/her contacting the teacher.	Fair Communicated with teacher, but was somewhat unorganized and was not diligent in his/her contacting the teacher.	Good Communicated with the teacher through email or survey.	Excellent Communicated with teacher and went above and beyond by visiting the classroom and/or meeting with the teacher (via Skype or phone).

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric