RCampus - Learning, ePortfolios, Assessments, Outcomes
Enter your login name here, or click here to go to the login page.
Enter your password:
forgot?   | click here to create a free account.
iRubric: "A Cell is Like A" Poster/Model Project rubric

iRubric: "A Cell is Like A" Poster/Model Project rubric

preview rubric

 

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

"A Cell is Like A" Poster/Model Project

  Derived from rubric: Earth's Interior Model
built by stharayil

Rubric Code: N8362B
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: (None)
Categories: Subjects: Biology   Geology  
Types: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Excellent
4 pts
Enter Title
3 pts
Average
2 pts
Needs Improvement
1 pts
Model
4 pts Enter description
Excellent

The model/poster has all required organelles/structures represented. The poster/model is well drawn/constructed, detailed, neat, and colorful. Representations of organelles/structures bears an accurate/strong resemblance to the organelle or structure
Enter Title

The model/poster has most of the required organelles/structures represented. The poster/model is well drawn/constructed, detailed, neat, and colorful.
Average

The model/poster has some of the required organelles/structures represented. The poster/model is somewhat well drawn/constructed and neat. Lacking in some detail and accuracy.
Needs Improvement

The poster/model has several organelles unrepresented
The poster/model is sloppy, careless and lacking in adequate detail and/or accuracy
Labels
3 pts Enter description
Excellent

Labels include ALL of the following: name of corresponding organelle and picture of organelle.
The analogies make sense and are logically and well reasoned.
Labels are typed, neat, well-printed and easy to read. Labels are firmly secured to their respective parts.
Enter Title

Labels include MOST of the following: name of corresponding organelle and picture of organelle.
The analogies make sense and are fairly well reasoned.
Labels are neat, well-printed and easy to read. Labels are firmly secured to their respective parts.
Average

Label are included however, some key requirements are missing. Some analogies may not be good comparisons. Labels are somewhat difficult to read Aesthetic presentation of label could be improved.
Needs Improvement

There are missing labels, or several critical components of labels are missing. Labels are messy and hard to read.
Composition-Explanation
5 pts This is the first part in the written component of your instructions.
Excellent

The written component explains in detail how each structure depicted in the poster/model is a suitable comparison to a specific cell organelle. Appropriate scientific terminology is used when necessary and correctly. The explanation is thorough and is given in more than 2 sentences. The explanation is CLEAR, LOGICAL, and well reasoned. The composition follows English language conventions, with few errors in spelling and grammar.
Enter Title

The written component explains in detail how most of the structures depicted in the poster/model is a suitable comparison to a specific cell organelle. Appropriate scientific terminology is occasionally used. The explanation is fairly thorough and is given in more than 2 sentences. The explanation is fairly clear, logical and well-reasoned. The composition follows English language conventions with some errors in spelling and grammar.
Average

The written component explains how some of the structures depicted in the poster is a suitable comparison to a specific cell organelle. The explanations could include more detail. Explanations may not be accurately/well-reasoned. There are quite a few errors in spelling and grammar.
Needs Improvement

The written explanation is minimal and severely lacking in detail. Comparisons are missing and/or several of the required structures/organelle comparisons are unexplained. There are several errors in spelling and grammar, that it interferes with the overall meaning/comprehension of the composition.
Collaboration/Individual Effort
2 pts If you worked with a partner, this criterion reflects my assessment of how well I think you worked with your partner.

If you worked individually, this criterion reflects my assessment of your overall effort on this project.
Excellent

Collaborated well with your partner. Work was distributed and carried out evenly and fairly. Equal effort is apparent from both partners.
-------------------------
Individual effort shows much careful thought, planning and consideration went into the production of this project
Enter Title

Collaborated fairly well with your partner. Work was distributed and carried out mostly evenly and fairly. A mostly equal effort is apparent from both partners. A few conflicts/arguments may have arisen
-------------------------
Individual effort shows some careful thought, planning and consideration went into the production of this project
Average

Collaborated somewhat well with your partner. While both partners were involved, one partner contributed somewhat more than the other. Some arguments/conflicts arose.
-------------------------
Individual effort was mediocre, with some effort put forth, but not a complete, vested effort.
Needs Improvement

Did not work well with partner. Work was very unevenly distributed. Many arguments/conflicts arose.
-------------------------
Individual effort was almost entirely or very strongly lacking. Evidence of sloppiness or of a rushed, last-minute project is apparent.
Following Instructions
1 pts
Excellent

All instructions/requirements for the project were followed and fulfilled as expected and explained. Instructions were fulfilled well and with quality work.
Enter Title

Most of the instructions/requirements for the project were followed and fulfilled as expected and explained. Instructions were fulfilled fairly well.
Average

Some of the instructions/requirements for the project were not properly followed or fulfilled.
Needs Improvement

Evidence of a severe lack of attention to the instructions/requirements for the project is apparent. Project is missing several of the required components or did not follow the instructions properly.



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
About Education Sites & Communities My Account Support
About RCampus
Terms of Use
Security & Privacy
Site Map
Case Studies
Classrooms
ePortfolios
Rubrics
Coursework
Grades
Book Exchange
Tutors
Website Gallery
Basic Groups
Study Groups
Club websites
Faculty Groups
My Account Settings
My Messages
My Calendar
My To-do List
My Favorites
My Documents
Free Sign up
Log in
Help & FAQ
Contact Us
Copyright © 2014 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.