Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: ED 235 How Does Learning Happen Group Assignment rubric

iRubric: ED 235 How Does Learning Happen Group Assignment rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
ED 235 How Does Learning Happen Group Assignment Create Your Own Ending Group Project Working in groups of 8, students will work collaboratively in pairs on a presentation to the rest of their group members based on the 4 foundations found in the How Does Learning Happen Document. Students will pair up and be assigned one of the foundations to present information on. Rubric Code: MXXAAXC By Abroere Draft Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8, Undergraduate

Group Work
	Needs Improvement 0 pts	Fair 15 pts	Distinctive 20 pts
Part 2: Power Point	Needs Improvement No written description is provided, or description is short with very little support from the document	Fair Uses general support from the document with brief or somewhat vague explanations in a fairly coherent presentation	Distinctive Detailed description of ideas and support from document are provided in a coherent presentation
Part 3: Professionalism	Needs Improvement Spelling and grammatical errors throughout presented materials, Pairs presentation is poorly thought out and lacks creativity and continuity with the document	Fair Few spelling and grammatical errors, materials shows evidence of effort and thought, shows some creativity and continuity with the document	Distinctive No spelling or grammatical errors, materials shows evidence of thought provoking ideas and group discussions, presentation is creative and has continuity with the document
Presentation	Needs Improvement Both pair members did not share a role in preparing and presenting the information, no evidence of planning or preparation, and did not take presentation seriously	Fair Each pair member had a role in the preparing and presenting and shows evidence of some preparation, and took presentation seriously for the most part	Distinctive Each pair member had a role in the preparing and presenting and, shows evidence of planning and preparation, performance is creative, presentation is taken seriously
Individual work
	Needs Improvement 1 pts	Fair 5 pts	Distinctive 10 pts
Written Self Reflection	Needs Improvement Limited description of roles, does not discuss positive aspects or things you could have done better, indicates very little effort put into each role	Fair General description of individual contribution role, mostly discusses either positive aspects or things you could have done better, but not a balance of the two, indicates limited effort put into each role	Distinctive Brief but detailed reflection of individual role that indicates both positive aspects of your roles and things you could have done better, indicates time and effort put into each role
Part 1: Written One Page Document	Needs Improvement did not complete questions completely, does not demonstrate an understanding of the document	Fair Some attempt to demonstrate understanding of the documents, general descriptions used	Distinctive Demonstrates a thorough understand of the document, detailed descriptions to support
Participation
	Needs Improvement 1 pts	Fair 3 pts	Distinctive 5 pts
Individual participation	Needs Improvement Very little, if any, contributions to group discussions, exhibited a negative attitude during discussions, did not complete quizzes, did not have individual work completed on time	Fair Contributed to group discussions on occasion, did not exhibit a negative attitude but did not offer much positive feedback either, completed most assignments, but did not complete all of the tasks assigned	Distinctive Actively and positively participated in group discussions and completed work on time, and for the day-to-day group work, completed all individual assignments
Group collaboration	Needs Improvement Negative attitudes towards each other, arguing during discussions, late submissions of work, lack of preparation for presentations	Fair Worked well together in class, but very little out-of-class work was completed to a high standard, did not communicate well to each other or to me, most work was completed on time	Distinctive Worked well together as a group, no arguing or negative communication, allowed each person to contribute and have a part in each stage of the project, handed in all group assignments on time, took time to prepare together for presentations

Keywords:

Group Assignment

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98