Skip to main content
iRubric: Art Education Pedagogy rubric

iRubric: Art Education Pedagogy rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Art Education Pedagogy 
Art Education Personal Philosophy Paper
This rubric will be used to evaluate the following assignment: Your personal philosophy on integrating the arts into elementary curriculum. In your reflection, complete the following: Defend the importance of the Arts in education. Defend the importance of art education. Define your personal philosophy of Arts Education. Support a preferred Arts education teaching model. Include an assessment explanation for evaluating student artwork. Include three art educational references.
Rubric Code: MXW7CW7
By lltcomet
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Individual Arts Personal Philosophy
  Poor Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

(N/A)

Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

(N/A)

Good/ Met the Standards 7-9

(N/A)

Exemplary Work 9-12

(N/A)

Defense

Defend the importance of Arts Education in your classroom.
Poor Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

The importance of Arts Education in your classroom neither explained not defended.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

The importance of Arts Education in your classroom is somewhat explained and defended.
Good/ Met the Standards 7-9

The importance of Arts Education in your classroom is well explained and defended.
Exemplary Work 9-12

The importance of Arts Education in your classroom is explained in an exemplary way and defended.
Definition

Define your personal philosophy of Arts Education.
Poor Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

Your personal philosophy of Arts Education is not explained.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

Your personal philosophy of Arts Education is barely explained.
Good/ Met the Standards 7-9

Your personal philosophy of Arts Education is well explained.
Exemplary Work 9-12

Your personal philosophy of Arts Education is explained in an exemplary way.
Model Advocacy

Inclusion of a preferred model of Art Education
Poor Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

Inclusion of an appropriate and preferred model of Art Education is not explained.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

Inclusion of an appropriate and preferred model of Art Education is barely explained.
Good/ Met the Standards 7-9

Inclusion of an appropriate and preferred model of Art Education is well explained.
Exemplary Work 9-12

Inclusion of an appropriate and preferred model of Art Education is explained in an exemplary way.
Assessment

Inclusion of your assessment explanation for evaluating student artwork.
Poor Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

No plan for assessment of student work is provided
(portfolio assessment, or an interview, or a rubric etc)
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

A somewhat inappropriate plan for assessment of student work is provided
(portfolio assessment, or an interview, or a rubric etc)
Good/ Met the Standards 7-9

An appropriate plan for assessment of student work is provided
(portfolio assessment, or an interview, or a rubric etc)
Exemplary Work 9-12

An exemplary plan for assessment of student work is provided
(portfolio assessment, or an interview, or a rubric etc)
References

Include at least 3 different appropriate art educational references
Poor Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

No appropriate art educational references are cited.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

One or two different appropriate art educational references are cited.
Good/ Met the Standards 7-9

Three different and somewhat appropriate art educational references are cited.
Exemplary Work 9-12

Three different and appropriate art educational references are cited
in an exemplary fashion.
Grammar/ Mechanics

Paper is grammatically correct with proper grammar, spelling, and paragraph structure. Is formatted properly.
Poor Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are not followed. Language is neither clear nor precise.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed in an fair fashion. Language is neither clear nor precise.
Good/ Met the Standards 7-9

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed in an good fashion. Language is clear and precise.
Exemplary Work 9-12

bb
Organization

Paragraphs flow easily from one to the other and make sense in
Poor Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

Content is incomplete, major points are not clear, questions not thoroughly answered in complete sentences, points are not explained. Critical thinking is poor.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

Content is fair, some major points are not clear, questions not thoroughly answered in complete sentences, points are not explained. Critical thinking is fair.
Good/ Met the Standards 7-9

Content is good, major points are clear, questions are thoroughly answered in complete sentences, points are explained. Critical thinking is good.
Exemplary Work 9-12

Content is exemplary, major points are crystal clear, questions are thoroughly answered in complete sentences, points are all explained in exemplary fashion. Critical thinking is exemplary.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16