- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: St. Johns River Pollution rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
St. Johns River Pollution Students have been asked to create a website about the St. Johns River and the pollution it is facing due to humans. The students then present their website to the class. Rubric Code: MX8734C By mdickinson2016 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5

St. Johns River Pollution
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
SC.5.L.17B	Poor The students website and presentation does not mention the impact humans have on the St. Johns River at all in their presentation.	Fair The students show understanding of the impact humans have on the St. Johns River. Students give 1-2 examples of how humans impact the St. Johns on their website and discussed with the class during their presentation.	Good The students have a clear understanding of why humans have an impact on the St. Johns River. 3+ examples of how humans impact the St. Johns are stated on their website and discussed with the class during their presentation.
SC.5.L.15.In.1	Poor The students do not identify ways local plants and animals have been impacted by the pollution of the St. Johns River.	Fair The students give 1-2 ways local plants and animals have been impacted by the St. Johns River pollution on their website and when presenting to the class.	Good The students give 3-4 ways local plants and animals have been impacted by the St. Johns River pollution on their website and when presenting to the class.
LAFS.5.RI.3.AP.7a	Poor Students used 0-1 print or online source to fuel their research throughout the project.	Fair Students used 2-3 print or online sources to fuel their research throughout the project.	Good Students used 4+ print or online sources to fuel their research throughout the project.
Knowledge Constructor 3B	Poor Students did not use reliable resources when searching for information. (Students did not use .org, .edu, .gov resources)	Fair Students used 2-3 reliable resources.	Good Students used 4+ reliable resources.
Attractiveness	Poor The students website is extremely difficult to navigate and use of font, color, graphics, etc. is extremely distracting.	Fair The students website is hard to navigate at times, with font, color, and graphics that may be distracting.	Good The students website is well organized and makes excellent use of font. color, graphics, etc. to enhance their website.
Presentation	Poor The presentation delivery was not smooth and audience attention was often lost.	Fair The presentation was noticeably rehearsed, fairly smooth, and held audience attention most of the time.	Good The presentation was well rehearsed, smooth, and kept the attention of the audience the whole time.