Skip to main content
iRubric: Jour 498 Debate Team Rubric

iRubric: Jour 498 Debate Team Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Jour 498 Debate Team Rubric 
Rubric Code: MX3A777
By SBluestein
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Journalism  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Jour 498 Debate Team Rubric
  Superior

20 pts

Proficient

16 pts

Poor

12 pts

Unsatisfactory

8 pts

Comprehension

Superior

The team clearly
understood the topic in-
depth and presented their
information forcefully and convincingly.
Proficient

The team clearly
understood the topic in-
depth and presented their
information with ease.
Poor

The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease.
Unsatisfactory

The team seemed
to understand the
main points of the
topic, but didn’t
present with ease.
Use of Factual Information

Superior

All information presented
in this debate was clear,
accurate and thorough.
Proficient

Most information presented in this debate
was clear, accurate and thorough.
Poor

Most information
presented in the debate
was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.
Unsatisfactory

Information had
some major
inaccuracies OR
was usually not clear.
SPJ Code & Ethical Principles

Superior

Team used at least 4 references to SPJ Code of Ethics and/or ethical principles.
Proficient

Team used at least 3 references to SPJ Code of Ethics and/or ethical principles.
Poor

Team used at least 2 references to SPJ Code of Ethics and/or ethical principles.
Unsatisfactory

Team used one or no references to SPJ Code of Ethics and/or ethical principles.
Organization

Superior

All arguments were
clearly tied to an idea
(premise) and organized in
a tight, logical fashion.
Proficient

Most arguments were
clearly tied to an idea
(premise) and organized in
a tight, logical fashion.
Poor

All arguments were
clearly tied to an idea
(premise) but the
organization was
sometimes not clear or logical.
Unsatisfactory

Arguments were
not tied well to an idea.
Delivery/Presentation Style

Superior

Team consistently used
gestures, eye contact, tone
of voice and a level of
enthusiasm in a way that
kept the attention of the audience.
Proficient

Team usually used
gestures, eye contact, tone
of voice and a level of
enthusiasm in a way that
kept the attention of the audience.
Poor

Team sometimes used
gestures, eye contact, tone
of voice and a level of
enthusiasm in a way that
kept the attention of the
audience.
Unsatisfactory

One or more
members of the
team had a
presentation style
that did not keep attention.
Rebuttal

Superior

All counter-arguments
were accurate, relevant
and strong.
Proficient

Most counter-arguments
were accurate, relevant and strong.
Poor

Most counter-arguments
were accurate and
relevant, but several were weak.
Unsatisfactory

Counter-arguments
were not accurate and/or relevant.
Persuasiveness

Superior

All arguments were logical and convincing.
Proficient

Most arguments were logical and convincing.
Poor

Some arguments were logical and convincing.
Unsatisfactory

Few arguments were logical and convincing.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16