Skip to main content
iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO205 rubric

iRubric: Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO205 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Assessment Criteria for Case Study CO205 
Assessment Criteria for Role Play CO205
Rubric Code: M729BA
By KatrinaTravers
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Component
50 %
  High Distinction

100-85%

0 pts

Distinction

84-75%

0 pts

Credit

74-65%

0 pts

Pass

64-50%

(N/A)

Fail

Below 50%

(N/A)

Introduction
20%
Introduces and succinctly clarifies

the situation faced by the couple
10%
High Distinction

Evidence of ability to interpret and understand the issues presented in the case study and summarise them succinctly and accurately.
Distinction

Evidence of ability to understand and analyse the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with some problems with clarity.
Credit

Evidence of understanding the issues presented in the case study, and summarise them, but with many problems with clarity.
Pass

Reproduced the case study details only, and many problems with clarity
Fail

No evidence of ability to understand or succinctly define the case study
Provides an overview definition of

the couples presenting issues from within the context of relevant theories and ideas
10%
High Distinction

A succinct and clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay is given, including the relevant theories and ideas to be discussed, with no errors.
Distinction

A clear introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, including the relevant thories and ideas to be discussed, with some problems with clarity and writing.
Credit

An introduction and summary of the focus of the essay given, including the relevant thories and ideas to be discussed, but with many problems with clarity and writing.
Pass

An introduction is offered, but with some errors in clarity of what the paper will be written on, and many problems with writing.
Fail

No summary of overview and focus of essay offered.
Main Body
55%
Theories, concepts and ideas of

approach chosen match effectively with the issues being faced by the clients
20%
High Distinction

Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the couple effectively, and communicate this succinctly and with no errors.
Distinction

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the couple, and communicate these, but with some errors.
Credit

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the couple, and communicate them, but with many errors.
Pass

Evidence of ability to reproduce appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the couple, but with many problems accurately communicating them.
Fail

No evidence of knowledge of appropriate theories, concepts and ideas to match the issues of the couple.
An insightful explanation of key

links between issues faced by the couple and relevant psychotherapeutic strategies of apporach with the couple is provided.
20%
High Distinction

Evidence of ability to identify and modify appropriate and relevant psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the couple are made, and this is communicated succinctly and with no errors.
Distinction

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the couple are made, and this is communicated but with some errors.
Credit

Evidence of ability to identify appropriate psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the couple are made, and this is communicated but with many errors.
Pass

Evidence of ability to reproduce psychotherapeutic strategies to address the issues of the couple are made, but with many problems linking the issues with strategies, and with communicating these links.
Fail

No evidence of knowledge of relevant psychotherapeutic strategies for the presenting issues of the couple.
Comprehensive reference to relevant

literature sources are provided
15%
High Distinction

A comprehensive reference to relevant literature sources are made, at all times, with no errors.
Distinction

Reference to mostly relevant literature sources are made, but with some errors.
Credit

Reference to mostly relevant literature sources are made, but with many errors.
Pass

Reference to some relevant literature sources are made, but not comprehensive.
Fail

No evidence of sourcing and citing appropriate literature sources are found.
Conclusion
15%
A succinct and precise summary of

the relevant issues faced by te cople and their relevance to key theoretical ideas have been made'
10%
High Distinction

A succinct and precise summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and the key theories are given with no errors.
Distinction

A succinct summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and the key theories are given with some errors.
Credit

A succinct summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and key theories are given with many errors
Pass

A summary of the essay, including the relevant issues, and theories are given but with many errors.
Fail

No summary of essay offered.
Effective recommendations for the

couple, with regard to possible solutions and/or future directions, are made
5%
High Distinction

A succinct and precise summary of the appropriate referral pathways are given, together with appropriate recommendations and future directions, are given, with no errors.
Distinction

A succinct summary of the appropriate referral pathways are given, together with recommendations and future directions, are given,with some errors.
Credit

A succinct summary of the appropriate referral pathways are given, together with recommendations and future directions, are given, with many errors
Pass

A summary of the referral pathways are given, together with recommendations and future directions, but with many errors.
Fail

No summary of referral pathways or future directions/recommendations given.
Overall Quality of Paper
10%
Quality of writing style

5%
High Distinction

Evidence of excellent essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling with no errors.
Distinction

Evidence of good essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling with some errors.
Credit

Evidence of satisfactory essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling with many errors.
Pass

Evidence of some essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation, and spelling, but with many errors.
Fail

No evidence of essay structure, flow of argument, academic prose, grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Use of APA formatting and

referencing
5%
High Distinction

Accurate use of APA 6th ed. formatting used throughout the essay and referencing, with no errors.
Distinction

Good use of APA 6th ed. formatting used throughout the essay and referencing, with some errors.
Credit

Satisfactory use of APA 6th ed. formatting used throughout the essay and referencing, with many errors.
Pass

Evidence of use of APA 6th ed. formatting used throughout the essay and referencing, but with many errors.
Fail

No evidence of use of APA formatting.



Keywords:
  • case study, counselling

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16