- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Initial Reflection rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Initial Reflection Reflection paper Rubric Code: M2W42A9 By jdinkel Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: Graduate

Reflection Paper
	Poor A poor job of providing the required information is performed by the writer. 0 pts	Fair The assigned category needs work. 1 pts	Good There is a fair effort to do the reflection. 2.5 pts	Very Good The writer does a good job applying the category to the journal article. 4 pts	Excellent The writer completely covers all required information. 5 pts
Submission guidelines 5 pts Is able to submit on time and follow the guidelines/mechanics on writing the paper (double-spaced, 1-inch margin, font standards, etc)	Poor Late submission and/or does not comply totally with any of the mechanics.	Fair Late submission and/or observes less than 50% of the guidelines.	Good Late submission and/or observes 75% of the guidelines.	Very Good Late submission and/or misses an item in the mechanics.	Excellent Submitted on time and follows all the mechanics in writing the paper.<BR> • APA 6th Edition formatting (DS, Time New Roman, MSWord format only)<BR> • Title Page <BR> • Table of Contents (Optional – use outline)<BR> • Documented Sources throughout the text (citations) <BR> • References/Bibliography of no less than 10 sources <BR> • Be no less than 5 pages in length and no more than 10 pages
Independent critical thinking 5 pts Uses logical and critical thinking in reflecting on curriculum. Insightful	Poor No exercise of independent critical thinking at all.	Fair Poor exercise of critical thinking.	Good There is an average effort for critical thinking/analysis.	Very Good One or more implications are given and are sufficiently clarified.	Excellent Implications are clearly explicated and demonstrate critical thinking skills
Personal experiences 5 pts The writer shares a personal classroom experience.	Poor No personal experiences are given.	Fair Personal experiences are poorly developed in the reflection.	Good Effort to develop and reflect on personal experience(s) is just fair.	Very Good Personal experiences are clearly mentioned and expanded on.	Excellent The personal experiences of the writer are fully explained and related to the given theme or topic.