Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: L- Current Issues Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
L- Current Issues Rubric
Current Issues Rubric
Rubric Code:
LXX8ACW
By
HeatherR
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Current Issues Rubric
Enter rubric description
Poor
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Content of Introduction
Team Grade
Poor
Introduction minimally presented the topic. The introduction did not engage the audience at all, was one-sided or unclear.
Fair
Introduction presented the topic but could have been slightly biased or did not present the full scope of the issue. Did not address why this issue is a current issue or give adequate history.
Good
Introduction gave a good and clear understanding of why the topic is an issue today. Presenters showed an unbiased introduction to the topic and explained the full scope of the issue.
Excellent
The hook was strong and engaging. The introduction gave a strong and clear understanding of the history of the topic and why the topic is an issue today. It was also very clear why we should care about this issue.
Body
Team Grade
Poor
Pros and cons were poorly covered-or-Summaries are very poor and unclear. It is not clear what the summary has to do with the overall issue.
Fair
Pros and cons were not adequately covered -or- The Article summaries may be missing some of the important points or it is not clear how the articles support the current issue.
Good
Most of the pros and cons of the issue were presented clearly. The articles summarize the main points of the articles and it is clear to the audience why the articles are important for this issue or how they support a point of view surrounding the topic.
Excellent
All of the pros and cons of the issue were presented clearly. There is a clear and strong understanding of their relationship. The two recent articles (2005-present) were summarized clearly and state the main points of the articles and it is clear to the audience why the articles are important for this issue or how they support a point of view surrounding the topic.
Content of Conclusion
Team Grade
Poor
Conclusion missing two of the below or did not do two of them effectively:
*summarized the main points
*solutions given by others
*Gave a prediction/warning/insight, etc.
Fair
Conclusion missing one of the below or did not do it effectively:
*summarized the main points
*solutions given by others
*Gave a prediction/warning/insight, etc.
Good
Conclusion summarized the main points, solutions given, explained team's reasons for the solutions, the conclusion made the audience take a new point of view or gain deeper insight on the matter from the teams prediction/warning/insight, etc.
Excellent
Conclusion summarized the main points, gave solutions presented by others, clearly and strongly. The conclusion made the audience take a new point of view or gain deeper insight on the matter from the teams prediction/warning/insight, etc. Conclusion was very strong.
Presentation Skills
Individual Grade
Poor
Presenter stares at slides or at note cards throughout presentation not making an effort to make eye contact. Presenter talks too quietly for audience to understand.
Fair
Presenter did not prepare adequately for the presentation. Presenter relies too much on notes or the slides. Presenter makes slight effort to make eye contact with the audience.
Good
Presenter maintains adequate eye contact throughout the presentation but did not memorize his/her presentation or had no cards but depended on ppt occasionally.
Excellent
Presenter is enthusiastic and maintains eye contact throughout the presentation. The presenter is confident and well-rehearsed and memorized his/her presentation. Presenter used sign-posting to introduce the next speaker or to begin or end his/her section.
PPT/ Prezi: Group Work
Team Grade
Poor
Two items listed in 'Excellent' category were missing or not done well.
Fair
One of the items listed in 'Excellent' category were missing or not done well.
Good
The PPT was well organized, font, pictures, etc. were clear and easy for the audience to see. PPT slides were occasionally wordy. Students clearly practiced together before the presentation, students were ready at the beginning of class to present.
Excellent
The PPT was well organized, font, pictures, etc. were clear and easy for the audience to see. PPT slides did not have too many words. The first presenter introduced each speaker. Students clearly practiced together before the presentation, students were ready at the beginning of class to present.
References
Team Grade
Poor
PPT/ Prezi did not include a reference page.
Fair
The team didn't submit PPT slide on time.
Good
PPT/ Prezi included a reference page which included all websites/books/journals used as a reference for the presentation.
Excellent
PPT/ Prezi included a reference page which included all websites/books/journals used as a reference for the presentation and followed the proper formatting found in our course book. Team handed in PPT slides on time.
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.