Skip to main content
iRubric: L- Current Issues Rubric

iRubric: L- Current Issues Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
L- Current Issues Rubric 
Rubric Code: LXX8ACW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Current Issues Rubric
Enter rubric description
  Poor

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Content of Introduction

Team Grade

Poor

Introduction minimally presented the topic. The introduction did not engage the audience at all, was one-sided or unclear.
Fair

Introduction presented the topic but could have been slightly biased or did not present the full scope of the issue. Did not address why this issue is a current issue or give adequate history.
Good

Introduction gave a good and clear understanding of why the topic is an issue today. Presenters showed an unbiased introduction to the topic and explained the full scope of the issue.
Excellent

The hook was strong and engaging. The introduction gave a strong and clear understanding of the history of the topic and why the topic is an issue today. It was also very clear why we should care about this issue.
Body

Team Grade

Poor

Pros and cons were poorly covered-or-Summaries are very poor and unclear. It is not clear what the summary has to do with the overall issue.
Fair

Pros and cons were not adequately covered -or- The Article summaries may be missing some of the important points or it is not clear how the articles support the current issue.
Good

Most of the pros and cons of the issue were presented clearly. The articles summarize the main points of the articles and it is clear to the audience why the articles are important for this issue or how they support a point of view surrounding the topic.
Excellent

All of the pros and cons of the issue were presented clearly. There is a clear and strong understanding of their relationship. The two recent articles (2005-present) were summarized clearly and state the main points of the articles and it is clear to the audience why the articles are important for this issue or how they support a point of view surrounding the topic.
Content of Conclusion

Team Grade

Poor

Conclusion missing two of the below or did not do two of them effectively:
*summarized the main points
*solutions given by others
*Gave a prediction/warning/insight, etc.
Fair

Conclusion missing one of the below or did not do it effectively:
*summarized the main points
*solutions given by others
*Gave a prediction/warning/insight, etc.
Good

Conclusion summarized the main points, solutions given, explained team's reasons for the solutions, the conclusion made the audience take a new point of view or gain deeper insight on the matter from the teams prediction/warning/insight, etc.
Excellent

Conclusion summarized the main points, gave solutions presented by others, clearly and strongly. The conclusion made the audience take a new point of view or gain deeper insight on the matter from the teams prediction/warning/insight, etc. Conclusion was very strong.
Presentation Skills

Individual Grade

Poor

Presenter stares at slides or at note cards throughout presentation not making an effort to make eye contact. Presenter talks too quietly for audience to understand.
Fair

Presenter did not prepare adequately for the presentation. Presenter relies too much on notes or the slides. Presenter makes slight effort to make eye contact with the audience.
Good

Presenter maintains adequate eye contact throughout the presentation but did not memorize his/her presentation or had no cards but depended on ppt occasionally.
Excellent

Presenter is enthusiastic and maintains eye contact throughout the presentation. The presenter is confident and well-rehearsed and memorized his/her presentation. Presenter used sign-posting to introduce the next speaker or to begin or end his/her section.
PPT/ Prezi: Group Work

Team Grade

Poor

Two items listed in 'Excellent' category were missing or not done well.
Fair

One of the items listed in 'Excellent' category were missing or not done well.
Good

The PPT was well organized, font, pictures, etc. were clear and easy for the audience to see. PPT slides were occasionally wordy. Students clearly practiced together before the presentation, students were ready at the beginning of class to present.
Excellent

The PPT was well organized, font, pictures, etc. were clear and easy for the audience to see. PPT slides did not have too many words. The first presenter introduced each speaker. Students clearly practiced together before the presentation, students were ready at the beginning of class to present.
References

Team Grade

Poor

PPT/ Prezi did not include a reference page.
Fair

The team didn't submit PPT slide on time.
Good

PPT/ Prezi included a reference page which included all websites/books/journals used as a reference for the presentation.
Excellent

PPT/ Prezi included a reference page which included all websites/books/journals used as a reference for the presentation and followed the proper formatting found in our course book. Team handed in PPT slides on time.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98