Skip to main content
iRubric: Research Project Presentation rubric

iRubric: Research Project Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Research Project Presentation 
Research Project Presentation
College of Engineering
Rubric Code: LXX8576
By cjunca
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criteria
  Excellent

25 pts

Good

20 pts

Needs Improvement

15 pts

Unsatisfactory

5 pts

Introduction of topic

Excellent

Topic was introduced clearly and in an interesting
way. Purpose of talk was made clear. Outline of
the points was given.
Good

Topic was introduced clearly, and purpose
of the talk was made clear.
Needs Improvement

Topic was introduced.
Unsatisfactory

Topic was not
introduced.
Development of topic

Excellent

Good understanding of the topic was
shown. Links and connections between
ideas were made clear. Information was
relevant and expressed in own words.
Points were developed with sufficient and
appropriate detail. Relations to the earlier
work were presented.
Good

Good understanding of the topic was
shown. Links and connections between
ideas were made clear. Information was
relevant and expressed in own words.
Points were developed with sufficient and
appropriate detail. Relations to the earlier
work were presented.
Needs Improvement

Some understanding of the
topic was shown. Some links
and connections were made
between ideas. Points were
usually developed with
minimum detail. Information
was usually relevant.
Unsatisfactory

No understanding of
the topic was shown.
Information was
irrelevant.
Ability to engage audience

Excellent

Speaker monitored audience and adapted
presentation accordingly. An interesting or
original approach was taken to the topic. Speaker
used techniques such as visual aids and props,
anecdotes, surprising facts.
Good

An interesting approach was taken to the
topic. Speaker used techniques such as visual
aids and props, anecdotes, surprising facts.
Needs Improvement

Some eye contact was made.
Techniques used to engage
audience were minimal, or
mainly ineffective.
Unsatisfactory

No eye contact was
made. No effort was
made to engage
audience.
Voice: clarity, pace, fluency

Excellent

Presenter spoke clearly and at a good pace to
ensure auidance comprehension. Language was
used effectively and delivery was fluent and
expressive.
Good

Presenter usually spoke clearly to ensure
audiance comprehension. Language was
generally clear and delivery was usually
fluent.
Needs Improvement

Presenter occasionally spoke
clearly and at a good pace.
Language was occasionally
clear.
Unsatisfactory

Presentation was not
clear at all. Language
was not appropriate
Use of visual aids

Excellent

Visual aids were carefully prepared and supported
the presentation effectively. They clarified and
reinforced the spoken message. The aids added
impact and interest to the presentation.
Good

Visual aids supported the presentation
effectively. They clarified and reinforced
the spoken message.
Needs Improvement

Visual aids were occasionally
appropriate and related to the
spoken message.
Unsatisfactory

No visual aids were
used.
Conclusion of topic

Excellent

The presentation was summed up clearly and
effectively, with key points emphasized.
Good

The presentation was summed up clearly.
Needs Improvement

An attempt was made to
conclude the presentation.
Unsatisfactory

There was no
conclusion.
Use of time

Excellent

Presentation time was used very efficiently.
Good

Presentation was ended on time.
Needs Improvement

Presentation time was not used
efficiently.
Unsatisfactory

Presentation was not
ended on time.
Answering questions from the panel

Excellent

Questions were answered with little difficulty.
Very good knowledge of the topic was
demonstrated. Language was correct and fluent.
Good

Most questions were answered. Answers
showed good knowledge and understanding
of the topic. Language was mainly correct.
Needs Improvement

Not all questions were
answered. Questions were
answered with difficulty, and
little knowledge of the topic
was demonstrated.
Unsatisfactory

None of the
questions were
answered.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98