Skip to main content
iRubric: Argumentation theory essay rubric

iRubric: Argumentation theory essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Argumentation theory essay 
Honors assignment #2-policy proposal
Write a 4-6 page paper which discusses at least four different theories related to argumentation. Make sure that your paper discusses theories which we have not discussed in class. There are theorists who provide additional information to the area of argumentation such as Habermas, Rogers, Brockreide, etc...
Rubric Code: LXX8396
By dmoss52
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Argumentation theory essay
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Average

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Content

Excellent

-Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
-All information is analyzed thoughtfully, not just summarized
-Topic is clearly defined and elaborated on.
Good

-Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
-Most information is analyzed, some just summarized
-Topic is defined but not elaborated on.
Average

-Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
-Some information is analyzed, much is just summarized
-Topic is mentioned
Poor

-Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
-Information is merely stated or summarized
-Topic is not clear
Theorists and theories

Excellent

Four theorists are provided. A thorough review of theories is demonstrated, evaluated, and analyzed.
Good

Four theorists are provided. A good amount of information is provided in evaluating, and analyzing theories.
Average

Less than four theorists are discussed. Information is provided for the theorists but lacks in depth evaluation and analysis of theories.
Poor

Less than four theorists are discussed. No discussion of theories provided.
Formatting

Excellent

-Paper is between 4-6 full pages in length
-double spaced
-12 pt., Times New Roman font
-1" margins
Good

-Paper is at least 4 pages in length
-double spaced
-12 pt., Times New Roman font
-1" margins
Average

-Paper is at least 3 pages in length
- font and margins partially correct
Poor

-Paper is less than 2 pages in length
-font and margins not correct
Grammar and Mechanics

Excellent

-No run-on sentences
-No fragments
-No spelling errors
-No errors in subject/verb agreement, pronouns or tense
- No punctuation or capitalization errors
Good

-Only one run-on sentence OR only one fragment
-4 or less spelling errors
-4 or less errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
- 4 or less punctuation or capitalization errors
Average

-2 run-on sentences OR fragments
-5 or more spelling errors
-5 or more errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
-5 or more punctuation or capitalization errors
Poor

-8 or more run-on sentences OR fragments
-More than 8 spelling errors
-More than 8 errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
- More than 8 punctuation or capitalization errors
Quality of research

Excellent

-Cited 5 or more sources
-Sources are reliable and properly evaluated.
-All information relevant to topic
-Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
Good

-Cited 5 sources
-Sources are mostly reliable.
-Citation errors minor.
-Most information relevant to topic.
-Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
Average

-Failed to cite 5 sources
-Source reliability is questionable.
-Information provided to support some elements of topic
Poor

-Failed to cite sources
-Source reliability is questionable.
-Information provided to support some elements of topic
Works Cited/Citations

Excellent

-All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-No errors in format or punctuation.
Good

-All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-2 errors in format or punctuation.
Average

-Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor

-Points deducted for plagiarism
-No sources properly cited in paper and/or bibliography.



Keywords:
  • argumentation, theory, essay



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98