Skip to main content
iRubric: SOAP note rubric

iRubric: SOAP note rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
SOAP note rubric 
Medical documentation for Occupational Therapy Assistant students.
Rubric Code: LX9C33W
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric SOAP Note rubric
Enter rubric description
  Unsatisfactory

3 pts

Needs Improvement

6 pts

Average

8 pts

Exemplary

10 pts

SUBJECTIVE: 5%

Client's perception of the treatment being received, the progress limitations, needs and problems. Addresses pain.

Unsatisfactory

Irrelevant statements; Does not document what the client said
Needs Improvement

Vaguely documents what the client said and lacks relevance to treatment condition
Average

Documents what the client says with some significance to treatment and condition
Exemplary

Documents client's limitations, concerns and problems as it relates to treatment and condition
OBJECTIVE: 40%

Observations of the treatment being provided. Contains all the measurable, quantifiable, and observable data. Includes CPT code(s), time spent during treatment.

Unsatisfactory

Omits documenting where the client was seen and for what reason; documentation is not written in chronologically or using categories. Does not specify the task and the assistance required to complete task. Never demonstrated skilled OT services. Never focused on client's response; judgmental. Statements are disorganized; failed to include performance skills or performance areas; measures are inaccurate or fail to reflect professional terminology.
Needs Improvement

Documents minimally effective where the client was seen and or what reason; documentation is sometimes written chronologically or using categories. Minimally specifies the part for the tsk and the assistance required to complete task. Occasionally demonstrated skilled OT services. Occasionally focused on client's response.
Average

Documents moderately effective where the client was seen and for what reason; documentation is frequently written chronologically or using categories. Substantially specifies the part for the task and the assistance required to complete task. Frequently demonstrated skilled OT services. Frequently focused on client's response.
Exemplary

Documents highly effective where the client was seen and for what reason; documentation is always written chronologically or using categories. Thoroughly specifies the task and the assistance required to complete task. Always demonstrated skilled OT services. Always focused on client's responses. Avoids being judgmental. Statements address all three: motor, process, and interaction skills in measurable terms. Measures are accurate and depict professional terms.
ASSESSMENT: 45%

Therapist interpretation of the meaning of the events reported in the objective section. Includes functional limitations along with expectations of the client's ability to benefit from therapy. Contains an explicit statement of progress or lack of progress.

Unsatisfactory

Partial interpretation of problems, progress and rehab potential documented. Assessment rarely states what is the intended goals based on client needs. Never justifies continued need for OT skilled services. Ineffectively draws a conclusion that justifies the plan. New information is introduced that was not evident in "S or O" section. No interpretations or thoughts about performance skills and how these would impact performance areas are identified.
Needs Improvement

Minimal interpretation of problems, progress and rehab potential documented. Assessment occasionally states what is the intended goal based on clients needs. Occasionally justifies continued need for OT skilled services. Moderate effectiveness when drawing conclusion that justifies the plan.
Average

Substantial interpretation of problems, progress, and rehab potential documented. Assessment frequently states what is the intended goal based on clients needs. Frequently justifies continued need for OT skilled services. Effectively draws a conclusion that justifies the plan.
Exemplary

Thorough interpretation of problems, progress, and rehab potential documented. Assessment always states what is the intended goal based on clients needs. Always justifies continued need for OT skilled services. Information in the "S and/or O" section give ground to documentation. Working includes an interpretation or "thinking" of what has been evidenced. Deification that the intervention was rational and beneficial. Safety issues identified.
PLAN: 10%

What the therapist plans to do next to continue with the goals and objectives in the treatment plan. Includes anticipated frequency and duration.

Unsatisfactory

Ineffectively documents frequency and duration of treatment. Specific and realistic parameters for monitoring and follow-up are rarely present. Never ends with a LTG or STG, whicevher is more appropriate for your client and practice setting. Plan does not support assessment made in previous section. No medical necessity or skilled intervention evident. Not thought for next session is given.
Needs Improvement

Moderately effective documents frequency and duration of treatment. Specific and realistic parameters for monitoring and follow-up are occasionally present. Occasionally ends with a LTG or STG, whichever is more appropriate for your client and practice setting.
Average

Effectively documents frequency and duration of treatment. Specific and realistic parameters for monitoring and follow-up are frequently present. Often ends with a LTG or STG, whichever is more appropriate for your client and practice setting.
Exemplary

Highly effective documents frequency and duration of treatment. Specific and realistic parameters for monitoring and follow-up are always present. Always ends wit a LTG or STG, whichever is more appropriate for your client and practice setting. Plan supports assessment made and overall documented information. Medical necessity and skilled intervention evident. A plan for the next session is given or recommends discharge to evaluating OT.
OTHER: 5%

Use of electronic health/medical records (EMR), spelling, grammar, therapist signature.

Unsatisfactory

Unable to access EMR easily, find template, document and print notes. Did not turn in to instructor or too tardy to be proficient. Grammatical errors, spelling errors, incorrect use of abbreviations. No use of medical terminology. No signature. (Penalty for late submission applies, per course syllabus)
Needs Improvement

Able to access EMR easily, find template issues with document and print notes.
Average

Able to access EMR easily, find template, document and print notes.
Exemplary

Able to access EMR easily, find template, document and print notes. Turn in to instructor efficiently and on (or ahead of) time. Spelling and grammar is correct, vocabulary is well versed, professional with evidence of accurate and appropriate medical terminology as needed. Signature evident.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16