Skip to main content
iRubric: Digital Citizenship Summit Project Presentation rubric

iRubric: Digital Citizenship Summit Project Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Digital Citizenship Summit Project Presentation 
Digital Citizenship Summit Project Presentation
Judges will use the rubric criteria to assess the final product of the students' projects.
Rubric Code: LX93A67
By mrsbunnell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric DCS project presentation
  Proficient

3 pts

Acceptable

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Not observed

0 pts

Key Knowledge and Understanding

The project is focused on teaching students key knowledge and understanding derived from standards, and success skills including critical thinking and problem solving. As a motif project, it crosses at least three disciplines, and aligns with a Positive DigCit value.
Proficient

Students demonstrate a mastery of critical thinking and problem solving skills. The project crosses at least three academic disciplines. Project aligns with one or more of the Positive DigCit values.
Acceptable

Students demonstrate some critical thinking and problem-solving skills. The project crosses two disciplines. Project aligns with one of the Positive DigCit values.
Poor

Students demonstrate few examples of critical thinking and problem-solving skills. The project only crosses one discipline. The project does not align with a Positive DigCit Value, or alignment is superficial or an incorrect interpretation.
Not observed

No evidence of problem-solving skills.
The project only crosses one discipline. It does not align with a Positive DigCit Value
Challenging problem or Question

The project is based on a meaningful problem or a question to answer, at the appropriate level of challenge for students, which is operationalized by an open-minded, engaging driving question.
Proficient

The project is based on a meaningful problem or a question to answer, at the appropriate level of challenge for students, and is expressed by an open-minded, engaging driving question.
Acceptable

The project is partially based on a meaningful problem or a question to answer, at a somewhat appropriate level of challenge for students, and is expressed by a partially open-minded driving question
Poor

The project shows little evidence that it is based on a meaningful problem or a question to answer. It is below the appropriate level of challenge for students, and the driving question is minimally open-minded or engaging
Not observed

There is no evidence of a driving problem or question
Sustained Inquiry

The project involves an active, in-depth process over time, and in which students generate questions, find and use resources, ask further questions, and develop their own answer.
Proficient

Students demonstrate that the project involves an active, in-depth process over time, and in which students generate questions, find and use resources, ask further questions, and develop their own answer.
Acceptable

Students partially demonstrate that the project involves an active, in-depth process over time, and in which students generate some questions, find and use few resources. There is little evidence that the students ask further questions or develop their own answer.
Poor

Students minimally demonstrate that the project involves an active, in-depth process over time, and in which students generate minimal questions, find and use minimal resources. There is no evidence that the students ask further questions or develop their own answer.
Not observed

Students do not demonstrate that the project involves an active, in-depth process over time. There is no evidence that the students generate questions, find and use resources, ask further questions, or develop their own answer.
Authenticity

The project has a real-world context, uses real-world processes, tools, and quality standards, makes a real impact, and/or is connected to students’ own concerns, interest, and identities.
Proficient

The project has a real-world context, uses real-world processes, tools, and quality standards, makes a real impact, and/or is connected to students’ own concerns, interest, and identities.
Acceptable

The project is partially based in a real-world context, uses some real-world processes, tools, and quality standards, makes some impact, and/or is partially connected to students’ own concerns, interest, and identities.
Poor

The project is not based in a real-world context, uses some real-world processes, tools, and quality standards, makes minimal impact, and/or is minimally connected to students’ own concerns, interest, and identities.
Not observed

The project is not based in a real-world context, nor does it use any real-world processes, tools, nor standards. It makes no impact, nor is it connected to students’ own concerns, interests, or identities.
Critique and Revision

The project includes processes for students to give and receive feedback on their work, in order to revise their ideas and products or conduct further inquiry.
Proficient

Students listened to and effectively utilized the critique and feedback from the judges and/or teachers. Project was revised, if recommended.
Acceptable

Students listened to critique and feedback, but did not institute all of the recommended revisions. Project was revised, in part, if recommended.
Poor

Students did not listen or were not responsive to critique from judges and/or teachers. Project was not revised if recommended.
Not observed

Students did not listen to feedback and critique. Did not revise as recommended.
Public Product

The project requires students to demonstrate what they learn by creating a product that is presented or offered to people beyond the classroom.
Proficient

Product is presented professionally and of good aesthetic quality. Project effectively communicates the problem or question and demonstrates their answer clearly.
Acceptable

Product lacks some professionalism and quality. Project communicates the problem or question, and adequately demonstrates the answer.
Poor

Product is disorganized and unprofessionally presented. Product does not communicate the problem or question, does not answer the essential question.
Not observed

No public product was produced for the DigCit Summit.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16