Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Research Project Presentation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Research Project Presentation Rubric
Presenting/Storytelling
High school students will present the results of two weeks of research on a chosen topic.
Rubric Code:
LX87XX6
By
CaryHall
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Researched Presentation Rubri
Remember, this is your FINAL EXAM. In total, this project is worth 20% of your grade for this course.
Poor
(D-F)
1 pts
Fair
(C)
2 pts
Good
(B)
3 pts
Excellent
(A)
4 pts
Quality of Research
Poor
Does not include information from at least 3 trustworthy sources. All basic, introductory knowledge. It shows little to no attempt to do academic research.
Fair
Includes information from 3-4 trustworthy sources, and information is somewhat new and revelatory. It shows a basic attempt to do academic research.
Good
Includes information from at least 5 trustworthy sources, and information is somewhat new and revelatory. It shows a true attempt to do academic research.
Excellent
Includes information from at least 5 trustworthy sources, and information is interesting, new, and shows depth of academic research.
Preparedness
Poor
Student clearly did not take this assignment seriously and was not prepared to present. Presentation was less than 6 minutes.
Fair
Student spent some time preparing, but the quality of the presentation would have been much better if the student had spent more time. Presentation may have been less than 6 minutes.
Good
Student spent a significant amount of time preparing the story and planning how to present. Presentation was 6-8 minutes.
Excellent
Student clearly took this assignment very seriously, was ready when called, and was well-prepared. Presentation was 6-8 minutes.
Presentation Skill
Poor
Pausing
Unrehearsed
Lack of, or poor, materials
Little eye contact
Very quiet voice
Fair
Some pausing
Little rehearsal
Fair materials
Some eye contact
Somewhat quiet voice
Good
Little pausing
Some rehearsal
Good materials
Good eye contact
Sufficient volume
Excellent
No pausing
Clearly practiced
Excellent materials
Excellent eye contact
Completely audible
Annotated Bibliography
Poor
There are no annotations included with Works Cited slide, or the Works Cited slide does not exist.
Fair
There are minimal annotations included with Works Cited. What is included is missing how the source relates to your topic and the type of example the source provides.
Good
There is an attempt to properly annotate each citation, but the annotations are missing either how the source relates to your topic or the type of example the source provides.
Excellent
There is a fully successful attempt to properly annotate each citation. The annotations include both how the source relates to your topic and the type of example the source provides.
Respect Given to Other Presenters
Poor
Talked and/or laughed often, used a phone or computer, or otherwise disrespected a fellow presenter.
Fair
Paid attention most of the time, but either became distracted and/or caused distraction at some points.
Good
Paid attention most of the time, but either became distracted and/or caused distraction at one point.
Excellent
Paid excellent attention, respected the other presenters, and showed appreciation.
Handout/Publication
Poor
Is incomplete or includes only one or two of the major points of the presentation, does not include a question, does not have enough detail, may not have been published on time; and may not be visually appealing.
Fair
Includes only one or two of the major points of the presentation, but either has not enough detail or far too much detail; may be missing a question; may not have been published on time; and may not be visually appealing.
Good
Includes some of the major points of the presentation, and includes a thought-provoking question for commenters, but either has not enough detail or far too much detail; was published on time; and is somewhat visually appealing.
Excellent
Includes all major points of the presentation without being overly detailed, includes an interesting and thought-provoking question for commenters, was published on time, and is visually appealing.
Dialogue
Poor
Did not participate in dialogue on at least 5 presentations, or did participate but misconducted himself or herself (teasing, joking, etc.).
Fair
Participated in dialogue on the minimum of 5 presentations, but did not attempt to thoughtfully address the questions.
Good
Participated in dialogue on 5-7 presentations, and partially attempted to thoughtfully address the questions.
Excellent
Participated in dialogue on 5-10 presentations, and made true attempts to thoughtfully address the questions and engage with peers on the subject.
Overall Quality/Effort
Poor
The assignment was not taken seriously at all and was not important to the student. The content and telling of the research were not interesting/ engaging.
Fair
The assignment was not taken very seriously and was not very important to the student. The content and telling of the research were not very interesting/ engaging.
Good
The assignment was taken somewhat seriously and was somewhat important to the student. The content and telling of the research were mildly interesting/engaging.
Excellent
Clearly shows that the assignment was taken seriously and was important to the student. The content of the research and the telling were quite interesting/ engaging.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.