- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Peer Review: Editor Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Peer Review: Editor Rubric Peer Review: Editor Rubric Please use this to provide your peer with your review: * In addition to this rubric, make the appropriate proofreading marks on the rough draft for full credit. If there are no proofreading marks and comments on the draft, then you will not receive full credit for this review. You are also expected to use Week 1's lecture on scientific writing to review your peer's paper. Your comments must reflect your appropriate use of that content. Rubric Code: LX5877W By kchandler Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: Graduate

Criterion
	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Needs Improvement (N/A)	Score (N/A)
MLA Format & Length	Good The writer followed all MLA Format requirements and no significant grammatical errors are revealed.	Fair The writer followed most of the MLA Formatting requirements and minimal grammatical errors are revealed.	Needs Improvement The writer revealed significant MLA Formatting errors and grammatical errors.	Score
Focus on Topic (Content)	Good There is one clear, well-focused topic. The main idea stands out and is sufficiently supported by detailed information and examples The purpose of writing the paper is clear.	Fair The main idea is somewhat clear. The supporting information is general and/or needs more detailed supporting information and examples. The purpose of the study is somewhat clear.	Needs Improvement The main idea is not clear, or there are very few details and examples. There is a seemingly random collection of information. The purpose of the study is unclear.	Score
Sequencing (Organization)	Good Details are placed in logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.	Fair Some details are not in logical order or expected order, and this distracts the reader.	Needs Improvement Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.	Score
Introductory & Closing Sentences	Good The introductory sentence grabs the attention of the reader. The closing sentence is strong; because it clearly reminds the reader of the main idea and leaves them with something to think about.	Fair The introductory sentence may require an attention grabber and/or your closing sentence may or may not remind the reader of the main idea or leave them with something to think about.	Needs Improvement There is no clear introductory sentence. There is no clear closing sentence, the paper just ends.	Score