Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: SPE 325 - 30 points rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
SPE 325 - 30 points
A Generic Rubric for Evaluating ePortfolios
The following rubric has been adapted by the ePortfolio Portal team as an example of the evaluation of eportfolios. The exact criteria will depend on the purpose of the evaluation. Source: http://www.danwilton.com/eportfolios/rubric.php
Rubric Code:
L38X4C
By
jmccrary
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
ePortfolio
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
ePortfolio Evaluation
Incomplete
0 pts
Partially Proficient
2 pts
Proficient
4 pts
Exemplary
6 pts
Reflections
Incomplete
No reflections identify and describe professional growth goals for lifelong learning.
Partially Proficient
A few reflections identify and describe professional growth goals for lifelong learning and these are constructive in nature.
Proficient
Most of the reflections identify and describe professional growth goals for lifelong learning and are constructive in nature.
Exemplary
All reflections clearly identify and describe professional growth goals for lifelong learning and are constructive in nature.
Selection
Selection of artifacts and written communication
Incomplete
Most artifacts and work samples are unrelated to the purpose of the eportfolio. There are more than four instances of unorganized, inaccurate, or difficult to interpret written information.
Partially Proficient
Few artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio. There are three or four occurrences of unorganized, inaccurate, or difficult to interpret written information.
Proficient
Most artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio. There are only one or two occurrences of unorganized, inaccurate, or difficult to interpret written information.
Exemplary
All artifacts and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio. All of the components demonstrate the use of clear, well organized, and accurate written communication.
Captions
Incomplete
None of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of that particular work including title, author, and date.
Partially Proficient
Some of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of that particular work including title, author, and date.
Proficient
Most of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of that particular work including title, author, and date.
Exemplary
Each artifact is accompanied by a caption that clearly explains the importance of that particular work including title, author, and date.
Layout and Text Elements
Incomplete
The eportfolio is difficult to read. Fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings do not enhance the presentation. Many formatting tools are under or over-utilized. Horizontal and vertical white space is used inappropriately so that the content appears cluttered. Background and colours are distracting. They diminish the readability of the text.
Partially Proficient
The eportfolio is often difficult to read. Fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings do not always enhance the presentation. Some formatting tools are under or over-utilized. Horizontal and vertical white space is used inappropriately in some places. Background and colours are distracting in some places. They diminish somewhat the readability of the text.
Proficient
The eportfolio is generally easy to read. Fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings enhance the presentation. A few minor format changes would enhance the presentation. Horizontal and vertical white space is used appropriately in most places. Background and colours generally enhance the readability of the text.
Exemplary
The eportfolio is easy to read. Fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings enhance the presentation. Horizontal and vertical white space is always used appropriately. Background and colours enhance the readability and aesthetic quality of the text.
Writing Mechanics
Incomplete
The text has more than 6 errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. It requires major editing and revision.
Partially Proficient
There are 4 or more errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling requiring editing and revision.
Proficient
There are a few errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. These require minor editing and revision.
Exemplary
There are few errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling, yet does not interefere with clarity.
Keywords:
eportfolio, e-portfolio
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More ePortfolio rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.