Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Mouse Trap Vehicle Report rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Mouse Trap Vehicle Report
Mouse Trap Vehicle Report
Rubric Code:
L3586A
By
tajala
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Mouse Trap Vehicle Report
Enter rubric description
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Title Page
1 pts
Enter criteria description
Poor
60% or more of the components necessary for a complete title page exist.
Fair
80% or more of the components necessary for a complete title page exist.
Good
All components required for the title page exist and are located correctly.
Abstract
2 pts
Enter criteria description
Poor
Does not completely explain the report in a concise manner. Purpose and objective of the work are unclear.
Fair
Does not completely explain the report in a concise manner. Purpose of the work is stated.
Good
Approximately one paragraph. Tells detailed information about the report. Contains objectives of the work.
Table of Contents
1 pts
Enter criteria description
Poor
Table of contents exists. But page numbers and sections are missing or inaccurate.
Fair
Table of contents exists but is missing page numbers or sections that are required.
Good
Table of contents exists with page numbers and all required sections of the report listed.
Introduction
2 pts
Poor
Is wordy or lacking information. Material is not related to what is in the report.
Fair
Is either wordy, lacking information or not related to the material in the report.
Good
Short brief explanation of the activity is complete and accurate.
Brainstorming
1 pts
Poor
Less than 5 rainstorming ideas given or discussed.
Fair
Brainstorming ideas are provided, but not discussed.
Good
Brainstorming ideas provided and fully described / discussed.
Design Selection
3 pts
Poor
Design is discussed, but why it was chosen is not.
Fair
Design is given. Little or no discussion provided for why or how design was selected / developed. Little or no discussion of main feature of the design.
Good
Design is fully described. Good description of selection process from brainstorming ideas. Main feature fully described.
Construction Process
2 pts
Poor
How the construction of the vehicle compared to the design not discussed.
Fair
Description of construction process provided, but no analysis of how the construction effected the vehicle's performance given.
Good
Detailed description of construction process given. Analysis of how construction enhanced or detracted from vehicle performance is provided.
Competition Performance
2 pts
Poor
Minimal information provided on competition.
Fair
Competiton rankings are briefly discussed. Little reasoning for rankings given.
Good
Competition ranks given and detailed reasoning for vehicle performance provided.
Vehicle improvements
2 pts
Poor
Very short description of possible improvements provided with no engineering reasoning.
Fair
Vehicle faults are described. Short list of improvements and recommendations are given. Little reasoning for improvements given.
Good
Vehicle faults are described. Improvements and recommendations for vehicle design are fully described and explained. Reasoning for improvements are fully detailed.
Materials
1 pts
Poor
Not all materials for project are not listed.
Fair
Design materials are given.
Good
Design materials are given and reasoning for material usage is discussed.
Conclusion
2 pts
Poor
Student has a summary that does not match the work in the activity.
Fair
Summary is too long or does not explain what the student accomplished.
Good
Student has a summary of what he/she learned and what the activity was all about.
Appendix
3 pts
Poor
Drawings and Schematics are just thrown in the back, are not labeled or do not exist.
Fair
Appendix holds information that does not belong. Appendix is labeled incorrectly.
Good
All large pieces of information are in an appendix. Each appendix is labeled and holds information such as schematics, and drawings.
Citations
1 pts
Poor
Few sources that were used are cited and the format has not been followed.
Fair
Some of the sources the student used are not cited and are not formatted correctly.
Good
All information gathered by the student has been cited with the proper format.
Written Report Format
2 pts
Poor
Report has many mistakes in grammar and spelling with no evidence of proof reading. Font size and margins are inappropriately used. Pronouns were used freely throughout the report.
Fair
Report has a few mistakes in grammar and spelling. Report is typed, but has some areas where fonts are excessively large or small. A few pronouns were used.
Good
Report was written in professional manner with no personal pronouns and appropriate grammer, spelling, and evidence of proof reading. Report is typed neatly with appropriate fonts and margins.
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.