- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Module Development rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Module Development Rubric Code: L2AA9X By kelvin_thompson Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Graduate

Module Development
	Poor 958.75 pts	Fair 1121.25 pts	Good 1283.75 pts	Excellent 1446.25 pts	Superior 1625 pts
Functional Module 50 %	Poor None of the module components are fully functional.	Fair Few module components are fully functional.	Good Some module components are fully functional.	Excellent Most module components are fully functional.	Superior All components of the module are fully functional.
Instructional Objectives 13.33 %	Poor Instructional objectives not present.	Fair Instructional objectives only vaguely stated for learner relevance.	Good Instructional objectives somewhat vaguely stated for learner relevance.	Excellent Instructional objectives somewhat clearly stated for learner relevance.	Superior Instructional objectives very clearly stated in such a way that their relevance is explicit to learners.
Assessment(s) 13.33 %	Poor Learning assessment(s) unrelated to instructional objectives or not present	Fair Learning assessment(s) somewhat misaligned with instructional objectives.	Good Learning assessment(s) at least loosely aligned with instructional objectives.	Excellent Learning assessment(s) somewhat clearly aligned with instructional objectives.	Superior Learning assessment(s) very clearly aligned with instructional objectives.
Instructional Activities 13.33 %	Poor Instructional activities are not present or are unrelated to instructional objectives or assessment(s).	Fair Instructional activities are somewhat misaligned with instructional objectives and assessment(s).	Good Instructional activities are at least loosely aligned with instructional objectives and assessment(s).	Excellent Instructional activities are somewhat clearly aligned with instructional objectives and assessment(s).	Superior Instructional activities are very clearly aligned with instructional objectives and assessment(s).
Audience Appropriateness 10 %	Poor Module appears to be unrelated to identified learners.	Fair Module is very inappropriate for identified learners.	Good Module is somewhat inappropriate for identified learners.	Excellent Module is somewhat appropriate for identified learners.	Superior Module is very appropriate for identified learners.