Skip to main content
iRubric: Computer Component Rubric

iRubric: Computer Component Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Computer Component Rubric 
Computer Component Rubric
This rubric helped grade a 4-page research paper completed by my CGS 2100 Computer Fundamentals and Apllications class. Its purpose is to research components and price comparison in order to build a personal computer.
Rubric Code: KXXX5W5
By irvinharris
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Persuasive Paper Rubric
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Below Average

(N/A)

Unacceptable

(N/A)

Research (20 pts.)

Excellent

Research was extremely well developed (10 pts.)
Good

Research was completed (7 pts.)
Fair

Research was attempted but incomplete (4 pts.)
Below Average

Research was attempted but was very incomplete
(1 pt.)
Unacceptable

No research was attempted (0 pts.)
Price Comparison (15 pts.)

Excellent

Excellent (15 pts.)

There is abundant Price Comparison and was concsie and well presented.
Good

Good (12 pts.)

There is good prince comparision and was presented well
Fair

Fair (9 pts.)

There was "some" prince comparison, but presented well.
Below Average

Below Average (7 pts.)

No price comparision, but components were presented well.
Unacceptable

Unacceptable (0 pts.)

No price comparison and no presentation.
Organization (15 pts.)

Excellent

Excellent (10 pts.)

Paper clearly followed model in packet. Had an introduction that hooked the reader into the paper. Also had a clear beginning, middle, and end. Paragraphs had at least 5-7 sentences. Effective transitions were used.
Good

Good (8 pts.)

For the most part, paper followed model given. Introduction hooked the reader. Had a beginning, middle and end. Most paragraphs had 5-7 sentences and transitions were used.
Fair

Fair (6 pts. )

The paper made some attempt to follow the model given. The writer tried to create an introduction to grab the reader's attention. Some paragraphs had between 5-7 sentences and some transitions were used. structure the argument has been made, but the structure is poorly developed.
Below Average

Below Average (4 pts.)

Introduction was trite, showing little originality. Paper jumped from topic to topic with little or no apparent organization.
Unacceptable

Unacceptable (0 pts.)

There was a total lack of structure.
Diction (15 pts)

Excellent

Excellent (5 pts.)

Formal diction in Standard English was used throughout the paper. No slang was used, and the writer used the third person point of view throughout the paper.
Good

Good (4 pts.)

Formal diction in standard English was used throughout most of the essay. Only one slang word was used and the writer used third person viewpoint throughout almost all of the paper.
Fair

Fair (3 pts.)

Formal diction in Standard English was used in about half of the paper. Several slang words were used and the writer shifted viewpoints through about half of the paper.
Below Average

Below Average (2 pts. )

Little formal diction in Standard English was used and the writer shifted viewpoints (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) throughout most of the paper.
Unacceptable

Unacceptable (0 pts.)

Paper was not written in Standard English.
Format (15 pts.)

Excellent

Excellent (10 pts.)

Paper was a full 4 pages long. It was done in the proper MLA format with title and works cited pages.
All papers and notecards were in a bound folder from the first to the last.
Good

Good (8 pts.)

Paper was nearly 4 pages long in the proper MLA format. It had a title and works cited pages. Papers and notecards were bound in a folder.
Fair

Fair (6 pts.)

Paper was 3 to 21/2 pages long but some of it did not follow MLA format. It had a title and works cited pages, but some of those had incorrect MLA elements. It was in a bound folder.
Below Average

Below Average (3 pts. )

Paper was 3 or fewer pages long and many of its elements did not follow MLA format. The title and/or works cited page was missing. It was in a loose folder and some elements were missing.
Unacceptable

Unacceptable (0 pts.)

The paper was four or fewer pages long and seemingly no attempt at following MLA format was made. It was not in a bound folder and elements were missing.
Conventions (20)

Excellent

Excellent (20 pts.)

No mistakes in spelling, punctuation or grammar.
Good

Good (18 pts.)

Four or fewer mistakes in spelling, punctuation and grammar.
Fair

Fair (15 pts. )

Five or fewer mistakes in spelling punctuation and grammar.
Below Average

Below Average) (10 pts. )

Six to 14 mistakes in spelling, punctuation, grammar.
Unacceptable

Unacceptable (0 pts. )

Fifteen or more errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar.



Keywords:
  • Research, writing, paper, technology,



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98