Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Art History Research Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Art History Research Paper
APA College Research Paper
Submit research paper of specified page limits typed on paper, double spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font following CMS guidelines. Include a title, endnotes, and bibliography citing at least 5 resources used researching the paper (exclusive of assigned texts and articles). Paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code:
KXXCC6X
By
drkdennis
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Research Paper
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Needs Improvement
(N/A)
Unsatisfactory
(N/A)
Quality of research
Excellent
--Cited 6 or more sources.
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information included.
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Good
--Cited 5 sources.
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information included.
--Sufficient information provided.
--Research of sufficent depth.
Needs Improvement
-- Cited 3-5 sources.
--Source reliablility questionable.
-Information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic.
--Surface research.
Unsatisfactory
--Failed to cite even 3 sources.
--Sources unreliable.
--Information interferes with ability of reader to understand paper.
--Irrelevant to thesis.
--Information does not support the topic.
--Surface research.
Content
Excellent
--Topic addresses all aspects of assignment, is appropriate breadth for length of paper & appropriate research topic.
--Contains clear and concise title, subtitles, illustrations, and resources page.
--Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth.
--5 or more in-text citations are used to support the thesis.
--Writer involved w subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, effective transitions, intro.
Good
--Topic includes most aspects of the project, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research.
--Contains somewhat clear and concise title, subtitles, illustrations, and resources page
--Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.<BR>
-- Less then 5 in text citations are used to support the thesis.<BR>
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropri
Needs Improvement
--Topic includes some aspects of the project, of semi appropriate breadth for length of paper & a topic is partially clear.
-- Only 2-3 in text citations used to support thesis
--Includes title, but missing subtitles, illustrations, and resources page.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Unsatisfactory
--Topic unclear and includes no aspects of the project, of inappropriate breadth for length of paper.
--Missing title, subtitles, illustrations, and resources page.
--Support for thesis insufficient.
--No organization, transitions, introduction, and no conclusion.
Grammar and Mechanics
Excellent
--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all style and min/max page requirements
Good
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 2 spelling errors.
--Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met most style and min/max page requirements.
Needs Improvement
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 3 spelling errors.
--More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Attepmted to meet style and/or min/max page requirements.
Unsatisfactory
-- Voice inconsistent and inappropriate.
-- Incorrect word choices.
--More than 5 spelling errors.
--More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 5 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Does not meet style and/or min/max page requirements.
Bibliography/ Resources
Excellent
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- No errors in format or punctuation.
Good
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Very few errors in format or punctuation.
Needs Improvement
--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Errors in format or punctuation do not compromise the ideas of the paper.
Unsatisfactory
--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- Errors in format or punctuation make ideas unclear.
Figures/Illustrations
Excellent
--Images discussed included and properly labeled and cited.
--Few errors in image citation and formatting of the artist's name, the title of the work, the date and medium(s).
--Inclusion of images/art work is justified by formal analysis relevant to overall thesis and argument.
--Ancillary illustrations are mostly justified by relevant description and comparison.
Good
--Images discussed are included and properly labeled and cited.
--Few errors in image in-text citation and formatting of the artist's name, the title of the work, the date and medium(s).
--Inclusion of images/art work is justified by formal analysis relevant to overall thesis and argument.
--Ancillary illustrations are mostly justified by relevant description and comparison.
Needs Improvement
--Images discussed included.
--Some errors in image in-text citation and image labeling.
--Lapses in formal analysis do not compromise overall thesis and argument.
--May include some ancillary illustrations that are not fully justified or relevant to thesis and argument.
Unsatisfactory
--Fails to include reproductions of images discussed.
--Errors or absence of image in-text citation and image labeling.
--Overall thesis and argument are compromised by little or no formal analysis
--No ancillary images or unjustified and irrelevant ancillaries.
Keywords:
Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research
Subjects:
Arts and Design
English
Humanities
Education
Types:
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.