Skip to main content
iRubric: Reflection/Discussion Critique Rubric

iRubric: Reflection/Discussion Critique Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Reflection/Discussion Critique Rubric 
Reflection/Discussion Critique Rubric
Students critique an article or other assigned reading(s), supporting their position with reasons and textual evidence, as well as compare and contrast their ideas with those of the author and secondary sources. These reflections should indicate an understanding of- not simply a restatement of -the material, and should demonstrate the ability to respond to it not only by personal opinion, but with references from the reading and/or secondary sources to corroborate their opinions.
Rubric Code: KXX8W3W
By myca005
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric CRITIQUE w/COMPARE-CONTRAST
  No Submittal

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Summary of Article

No Submittal

Student did not submit the assignment.
Poor

The student's understanding of the text is so incomplete or has so many misconceptions that the student cannot be said to understand the topic.
Fair

The student has an incomplete understanding of the essential information in the text, and has omitted key points and/or supporting details from the paper.
Good

The student has a complete understanding of the information in the text that is important but has not included some of the key points into his/her argument and/or supporting details.
Excellent

The student has a complete and detailed understanding of the text and has highlighted key points as well as appropriate supporting details in the body paragraphs.
Critique of Article

No Submittal

Student did not submit the assignment.
Poor

The student does not construct a generalized judgment about the text, or constructs one that is not at all supported by the specifics submitted.
Fair

The student attempts to construct a generalized judgment about the text, but it has a superficial relationship to the specifics that have been identified in the article; and/or the specifics (content, organization, etc.) do not totally support the generalization.
Good

The student constructs generalized judgments about the text that have some relationship to the specifics that have been identified in the text, but specifics (content, organization, conclusions) may not totally support the generalization.
Excellent

The student constructs valid generalized judgments about the text and clearly explains why the judgments are based on specifics (content, organization, conclusions) that have been identified from the text.
Purpose & Evidence

No Submittal

Student did not submit the assignment.
Poor

The student compares or contrasts, but does not include both. There is no supporting information or support is incomplete.
Fair

The student compares and contrasts items, but supporting information is incomplete. The student may include information that is not relevant to the comparison.
Good

The student compares and contrasts items clearly, and provides supporting information but it is general. The student includes only the information relevant to the comparison.
Excellent

The student compares and contrasts items clearly and fully. The student points to specific examples to illustrate the comparison, and includes only the information relevant to the comparison.
Organization & Structure

No Submittal

Student did not submit the assignment.
Poor

Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized. No conclusion.
Fair

The student breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure, but some information is in the wrong section. Some details are not in a logical or expected order, which distracts the reader, and/or no conclusion.
Good

The student breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure, but does not follow a consistent order when discussing the comparison and/or a strong conclusion may be lacking.
Excellent

The student breaks the information into whole-to-whole, similarities-to-differences, or point-by-point structure, and follows a consistent order when discussing the comparison. Strong conclusion.
Conventions

No Submittal

Student did not submit the assignment.
Poor

Writer makes more than 4 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Fair

Writer makes 3-4 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Good

Writer makes 1-2 errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.
Excellent

Writer makes no errors in syntax, S/V agreement, parallelism, active/passive, spelling, or organization that distract the reader.



Keywords:
  • Critique, Summary, Article, College Essay, Compare and Contrast,



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98