- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Pathophysiology Group Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Pathophysiology Group Project Pathophysiology Group Project This rubric outlines requirments for the group work assignment Pathophysiology Rubric Code: KX7WW9C By c_lynch Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Nursing Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Pathophysiology Group Project
	Poor 1 pts	Minimal Effort 2 pts	Average 3 pts	Above Average 4 pts
Presentation	Poor Student presented reluctantly, was not prepared or seemed disinterested.	Minimal Effort References are provided but not reflected in the presentation. Not all areas of information are covered. Minimally engages the audience	Average Information presented addresses most aspects of research, including pathophysiology, routine treatment, blood work or other tests, prognosis or expected outcomes. Occasionally engages audience	Above Average Covers all aspects of research listed in "average" category. Offers insight into new or developing treatments available. Actively engages the audience
Mode of Presentation	Poor PowerPoint slides or storyboards lack imagination, or contain only text. No use of background or illustrations.	Minimal Effort Minimal use of illustrations, graphs or tables. Slides overly busy, or distracting.	Average Good use of illustrations, graphs or tables in addition to text. Slides well balanced and easy to read. Good use of background and color. Presentation is polished and well prepared.	Above Average In addition to "average" category items, original, effective presentation that reflects preparation and addresses all aspects of the research.
Project Organization	Poor Lacks organization and labeling of content	Minimal Effort Some organization but labeling of content not clear	Average Organize with clear labeling of content	Above Average Well organized clear and detailed labeling
Content	Poor Ideas are disjointed and unclear	Minimal Effort Ideas are loosely connected; not clear explored or supported	Average Sufficient material; many good points but not entirely balanced and has little variations	Above Average Good material that clearly relates ideas; supports and explore idea; uses different materials
Research	Poor Presented textbook information only on subject assigned or sited unacceptable references (i.e. wikipedia)	Minimal Effort 1-2 credible references in addition to information provided in textbook	Average 3 credible references in addition to the information provided in the textbook	Above Average more than 3 credible references in addition to the information provided in the text