Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Boys Varsity Football Head Coach Rubric

iRubric: Boys Varsity Football Head Coach Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Boys Varsity Football Head Coach Rubric Boys Varsity Football Head Coach Rubric Rubric Code: KX64383 By conklej Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assessment Grade Levels: (none)

FB Coaching Interview Rubric Candidate
	Poor demonstrates little evidence 1 pts	Fair demonstrates average evidence 2 pts	Good demonstrates a higher than average amount of evidence 3 pts	Excellent demonstrates a superior answer or outstanding amount of evidence. 4 pts
Conflict management 4 pts	Poor Candidate exhibits very little idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Fair Candidate exhibits some idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Good Candidate indicates ways to properly deescalte situation and deal with the conflict.	Excellent Candidate shows a vast array of techniques to handle the situation and to de escalate the situation and handle the conflict.
Personal Reflection 4 pts	Poor Candidate does not see any items in personal life needing adjustment.	Fair Candidate recognizes personal life may have some adjustment, but cites little examples.	Good Candidate recognizes the fact that changes will possibly need made and cites examples of how it will impact them personally.	Excellent Candidate has a thorough idea of how the position will affect them personally and what they will have to do to properly adjust to the focal position they will hold. Candidate is able to give examples along with how they will handle.
Employment 4 pts	Poor Candidate demonstrated no accomodations to be made for their employment elsewhere.	Fair Candidate has some ideas of how they will deal with their employment elsewhere.	Good Candidate has solid ideas of how they will overcome their employment elsewhere and cites examples of how to deal with this obstacle.	Excellent Candidate has detailed<BR> ideas of how they will overcome their employment elsewhere and cites examples of how to deal with this obstacle.
Media/Team Communication 4 pts	Poor Candidate does not cite examples of how to maximize exposure for his team through the media.	Fair Candidate cites some ideas of how to get exposure for their team through the media.	Good Candidate cites a variety of manners, ideas they have which would generate interest in the players and maximize their exposure.	Excellent Candidate understands the importance of makign sure kids feel valued, and cites examples of how this will occur and the need to use the media to bolster as many individuals as possible.
Transition, Philosophy, Conflict 4 pts	Poor Candidate does not demonstrate organized, detailed thoughts in the area of how they will move ahead with their ideas	Fair candidate demonstrates some evidence of having a plan in this area.	Good Candidate demonstrates the ability to talk in detail of their plan as well as provide some examples.	Excellent Candidate has clear conscise plan with evidence of how it will be accomplished.
Community Involvement 4 pts	Poor Candidate does not provide examples with evidence of how they will be accoplished to get the community involved.	Fair Candidate has conventional ideas such as youth camps, and boosters but not ideas which are creative in nature.	Good Candidate has examples of ideas which are creative to foster community involvement but shows little evidence of how they will be accomplished.	Excellent Candidate has creative ideas of ways to involve the community with evidence to show how they will be accomplished.
Structure/Discipline 4 pts	Poor candidate doesn't have a clear idea of how to deal with this issue.	Fair Candidate has an idea of what is expected but does not have clear expectations of how to accomplish	Good Candidate has expectation and and clear expectations with methods to accomplish these goals and expectations.	Excellent candidate has a through understanding of what is needed to build structure and discipline. Candidate has examples of how this will be implemented and accomplished in their program.
Program Vision 4 pts	Poor Candidate demonstrated no long-term plans or goals for program. Candidate does have goals but not clear evidence of how they will move to accomplish.	Fair Candidate has some ideas of future for program, but did not specifically express what the goals are with ways to implement	Good Candidate has direction of goals for program and a plan to achieve desired goals	Excellent Candidate has detailed plans for goals and vision of program and provides explanation with evidence how they will be accomplished.
Coaching Expectations 4 pts	Poor Candidate has some knowledge of roles among the staff.	Fair candidate has detailed knowledge about what is expected from the staff and also from them as the leader of the staff	Good candidate has clear expectations with well defined roles for each of the coaches	Excellent candidate has outlined roles with expectations and gives examples fo what each coach is expected to do to be successful on the staff
Personal Qualities 4 pts	Poor candidate is not reflective in nature and is only able to cite strengths they can offer the program	Fair Candidate is reflective in nature but isn't able to tell how these items will impact the program	Good Candidate is able to cite strengths and weaknesses and how they will impact the program but doesn not tell how they will work to address their weaknesses	Excellent Candidate is reflective and is able to cite examples of positive and negative items which they will use to foster and grow the program. They also address how they will handle their weaknesses.
Eligibility 4 pts	Poor Candidate has little experience and does not have knowledge of ways to help athletes stay eligible	Fair candidate cites examples that are proactive and methods which will help students stay eligible.	Good candidate shows that they would place their eligibility and role of a student ahead of their role as a football player	Excellent Candidate cites examples of how they will work in a hands on manner to make sure that the student achieves their academic potential while a member of their program.
School Community partnership 4 pts	Poor Candidate has no experience with this and is unable to create a rapport with parents, staff, school, and community. Does not cite ways to get people to buy in.	Fair Candidate has experiences to cite and is able but not confident to create a rapport with parents, staff and community. has limited ideas how to get people to buy into vision.	Good Candidate has experience and is adequate in creating a rapport with parents, staff, school, and community. Is able to cite changes and hwo they will accomplish	Excellent Candidate has experience, demonstrated how to create a rapport with parents, staff, school and community, cites changes and ways to move to accomplish those ideas and given specific details how people will buy into vision
Youth/Middle School Program Develop 4 pts	Poor Candidate has no plans on involving youth program	Fair Candidate is willing to involve youth program but plan is not detailed	Good Candidate has plans on involving youth program but offers little evidence of how they would accomplish	Excellent Candidate has plans and detailed information on involving youth program in conjunction with high school. Is able to sight ways they will be integrated together.

Keywords:

Football Coach Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Vocational rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98