- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Tutorials Pràcticum II rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Tutorials Pràcticum II This rubric assesses what I expect from students who will be doing the practice teaching in highschools during a 6 week period of time Rubric Code: KX5WCB8 By cybersue Draft Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: (Other) Grade Levels: Graduate

Enter rubric title
	Very Good 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Not Acceptable 1 pts
Attendance to face-to face tutorial	Very Good Student attended all 6 tutorials	Good Student attended a minimum of 4 tutorials	Not Acceptable Student attended 3 or less tutorials
Participation	Very Good Student actively participated in sessions and gave concrete examples from classes observed. Critical reflection is apparent.	Good Student actively participated in sessions and was able to talk about observed classes. Some critical reflection is observed.	Not Acceptable Student was not an active participant in the sessions and contributed very little to the discussion.
Uploading docs requested	Very Good Student uploaded the requested documents to the shared folder. They went beyond what was asked for.	Good Student uploaded the requested documents to the shared folder.	Not Acceptable Student did not contribute or contributed very little to the documents in the shared folder.
Teaching Unit	Very Good The teaching unit was very clear and innovative. It included a good example of a digital tool (ICT) and a rubric for assessment.	Good The teaching unit was quite clear but not very innovative. It lacked a good example of a digital tool (ICT) or a rubric for assessment.	Not Acceptable The teaching unit needed more time and effort put into it. One of the following was missing: digital tool (ICT) and a rubric for assessment. (Or they were poor examples.)
Final report	Very Good Final report shows a lot of personal professional reflection. It includes critical thinking towards the classes observed and his/her own classes. Photos, links and improvement ideas were included.	Good Final report shows some personal/professional reflection. It lacks one of the following: critical thinking towards the classes observed or towards his/her own classes. Few photos, links or ideas for improvement included.	Not Acceptable Very weak final report with limited information and little reflection done by the student. More professional critical thinking needed.