Skip to main content
iRubric: Motor Speech Disorders Case Studuy rubric

iRubric: Motor Speech Disorders Case Studuy rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Motor Speech Disorders Case Studuy 
This rubric has been adapted for a Case Study project in a Motor Speech Disorders Class. (this rubric is an adaptation of a sample graduate medicine rubric provided by rcampus.com, rubric #J9AWA9) (http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=J9AWA9&sp=yes)
Rubric Code: KX5C5C6
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Past Medical History
(15 points)
  Exceptional

15 pts

Satisfactory

10 pts

Unacceptable

6 pts

History

15 points

Exceptional

History is complete and age/gender appropriate. Neurological history and diagnostic information is clearly presented. It is written in logical format.
Satisfactory

History is age/gender appropriate and contains pertinent information. However, it is missing some vital points relating to the chief complaint. Neuro-diagnostic information may not be complete.
Unacceptable

History is scant. The majority of vital information is missing relating to the chief complaint.
Assessment and Plan
(40 points)
  Exceptional

15 pts

Satisfactory

10 pts

Unacceptable

6 pts

Oral-Mechanism Examination

15 points

Exceptional

*Physical exam has been completed as instructed, is age/gender appropriate, relates to the chief complaint, and pertinent findings.
Satisfactory

*Physical exam is appropriate for the chief complaint but there are pertinent systems or special tests missing.
Unacceptable

*Appropriate physical examination is incomplete. The information obtained would not be sufficient to support the diagnosis.
Speech Characteristics

15 points

Exceptional

Intelligibility across subsystems is detailed. Speech samples are included. Interpretation of perceptual-acoustic cues are elaborated on.
Satisfactory

Some speech sample data is included. Intelligibility is addressed but not all of the perceptual-acoustic cues are interpreted correctly.
Unacceptable

Portions of speech samples, data on intelligibility, and/or perceptual-acoustic cues are not included or are misinterpreted.
Other Clinical Characteristics

15 points

Exceptional

The assessment lists ALL of the pertinent problems for the patient, not just the chief complaint. These include other neurological symptoms that aid in diagnosis.
Satisfactory

The assessment lists the chief complaint/main problem for the patient but one or more problems is missing. Some but not all of the neurological symptoms are included.
Unacceptable

The main problem is not listed.Neurological symptoms are missed or interpreted incorrectly.
Treatment
(25 points)
  Exceptional

25 pts

Satisfactory

18 pts

Unacceptable

10 pts

Treatment Overview

25 points

Exceptional

There is a complete discussion of the actual treatment including rationale for each aspect of treatment.
Satisfactory

The summary of treatment is adequate with some facts omitted. Data supporting treatment outcomes is not adequate or misinterpreted.
Unacceptable

The summary of treatment is poor and many facts are omitted. Limited evidence to support treatment plan.
Style
(20 points)
  Exceptional

5 pts

Satisfactory

4 pts

Unacceptable

3 pts

Organization

5 points

Exceptional

The paper is well-written in a logical, orgainzed manner.
Satisfactory

The paper relays infomation but is slighlty disorganized.
Unacceptable

The paper does not relay adequate information on the subject, is disorganized and difficult to follow.
APA

5 points

Exceptional

All of the paper follows the current APA Manual of Style gudelines.
Satisfactory

The majority of the paper follows the current APA Manual of Style guidelines.
Unacceptable

The paper does not follow the current APA Manual of Style guidelines.
Content

5 points

Exceptional

The length of the paper is appropriate to communicate the ideas presented professionally.
Satisfactory

There are topics throughout the paper which should have been explained more thouroughly.
Unacceptable

The paper is poorly written with incomplete data and communication of thought.



Keywords:
  • Speech Pathology







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98