Skip to main content
iRubric: The Great Gatsby Group Presentation rubric

iRubric: The Great Gatsby Group Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
The Great Gatsby Group Presentation 
Rubric Code: KX46459
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Literary Analysis Presentation
  Excellent

"A"

(N/A)

Good

"B"

(N/A)

Fair

"C"

(N/A)

Poor

"D"

(N/A)

Content

Excellent

• Information shows expertise in textual understanding, use of literary terms, and in •Information presented establishes context within the passage and in the text as a whole.
• The analysis demonstrates a clear, complete understanding of the assignment and literature selection.
• The analysis demonstrates a very clear purpose and focus.
• Analysis seamlessly includes a synopsis of the literature selection.
Good

•Student gives accurate and sufficient information with attention to context and has solid understanding of literary terms.
• A good understanding of the assignment and literature selection is demonstrated.
• The analysis demonstrates a clear purpose and focus.
• Analysis includes a synopsis of the literature selection.
• Presentation shows an understanding of elements of literary analysis.
Fair

•Student gives mostly accurate and sufficient information, with some attention to context
• The analysis demonstrates some but incomplete understanding of the assignment and/or literary analysis.
• An incomplete understanding of the literature selection is demonstrated.
• The analysis has an unstated purpose and focus.
• Analysis includes an incomplete/inaccurate synopsis of the selection.
Poor

•Student gives inaccurate or insufficient information and student fails to address context.
• An incomplete and sometimes inaccurate understanding of the literature
selection and/or the assignment is demonstrated.
• No purpose and focus are presented.
• Analysis may not include a synopsis of the literature selection.
• Presentation shows little or an inaccurate understanding of literary analysis.
Use of Evidence

Excellent

•Student uses textual evidence to support well-developed claims/ideas.
•Evidence is substantial and has direct correlation to claim.
•Evidence is correctly cited.
Good

•Student uses textual evidence to support ideas/claims.
•Correlation may be difficult to follow at times, but attempt to create link is evident.
Fair

•Student gives broad ideas with some textual evident; textual evidence may be misused.
• Examples from the work of literature are quoted without a clear connection to the focus of the analysis.
Poor

•Student gives broad ideas with no textual evidence or evidence doesn't correlate with ideas.
•Examples from the work of literature are not cited.
Delivery

Excellent

•Student maintains eye contact with audience and voice is clear and correct, •Student has precise pronunciation of terms
• All audience members can hear presentation.
•Student is very enthusiastic and fluid.
•Presentation demonstrates
mastery of grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.
Good

•Student maintains eye contact most of the time and voice is clear.
•Student pronounces most words correctly.
•Most audience members can hear presentation. Student creates a fluid presentation.
•Presentation demonstrates
control of grammar, usage,
mechanics and spelling.
Fair

•Student occasionally uses eye contact and voices are low.
•Student incorrectly pronounces or seems unfamiliar with terms.
•Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
•Student is somewhat fluid in presentation.
•Presentation contains some intrusive errors in grammar,usage, mechanics and spelling.
Poor

•Student presents information with no eye contact.
•Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces or uses terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.
•Body language is too distracting.
•Presentation contains
frequent, severe errors in
grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.
Prepardness

Excellent

•Student came in completely prepared for the presentation and practiced
• Student did not read from the slides, but presented information not written on slides
Good

•Student showed some evidence of practice and rarely reads from the slides
Fair

•Student showed very little practice and mainly read from the slides
Poor

•Student showed no evidence of practice and read directly from the slide
Organization

Excellent

•Student presents a sophisticated, logical, and interesting organizational sequence which audience can easily follow.
Good

•Student develops logical sequence which audience can follow.
Fair

•Student's presentation and pattern is vague and ill-conceived; lacks clear structure, making it hard for the audience to follow
Poor

• Student is lacking in organization and the audience cannot follow their presentation



Keywords:
  • Presentation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98