Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: SAM Animation Projects rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
SAM Animation Projects
SAM Animation Projects
Students will be using SAM Animation for various projects.
Rubric Code:
KC65AC
By
pillery
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Computers
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
SAM Animation - Animate Your Name
Good
5 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
1 pts
Planning/Storyboard
Good
• Storyboard detailed and very easy to read and follow. <BR>
<BR>
• Much planning is apparent, with regards to background preparation, assigning tasks(if working in groups), and/or other aspects of pre-animation production.
Fair
• Storyboard is mostly easy to read and follow. <BR>
<BR>
• A reasonable amount of planning is evident however some essential elements were not presented prior to animation.
Poor
• Storyboard is too general. <BR>
<BR>
• Little planning is evident. More detail is required before animation can be carried out effectively.
Sets/Characters/Props
Good
• Sets/Characters/Props are exceptionally designed and cleverly communicate the concept of the animation. <BR>
<BR>
• Sets/characters/props are superbly intuitive, visually stimulating, and imaginative creating a sense of realism. <BR>
<BR>
• Much thought, time, and attention in the finest details is evident and ultimately enhances the overall animation.
Fair
• Sets/Characters/Props are well designed and communicate the concept of the animation well. <BR>
<BR>
• Sets/characters/props are visually stimulating and help create a sense of realism to the animation. <BR>
<BR>
• Good amount of thought, time, and attention to details is evident and help to enhance the animation.
Poor
• Sets/Characters/Props lack creative design and provide little value to the animation. <BR>
<BR>
• Sets/characters/props provide minimal visual stimulation and do not compliment the animation. <BR>
<BR>
• Not enough thought, time, and/or attention to detail is evident.
Organization of Content
Good
All content is logical, intuitive, and expressed through student’s own words. <BR>
<BR>
• Subject knowledge is evident throughout and all information is accurate, appropriate, and clear. <BR>
<BR>
• Student uses interesting sequence of scenes and actions. <BR>
<BR>
• Entire animation is clear from beginning to end.
Fair
• Almost all content is in student’s own words and requires few corrections. <BR>
<BR>
• Subject knowledge is evident in much of the animation and information is accurate, appropriate, and clear. <BR>
<BR>
• Most scenes and actions are presented in a logical manner. <BR>
<BR>
• Storyline is easily followed throughout animation.
Poor
• Less than half of the content is in student’s own words and requires many corrections. <BR>
<BR>
• Some subject knowledge is evident however some information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed. <BR>
<BR>
• Some logic to the sequence of scenes and actions are evident but not easily followed throughout animation.
Animation: Creativity & Originality
Good
• Creativity is evident in the use of ideas, applications, and/or different materials used. <BR>
<BR>
• Animation is fresh, original, inventive, and captures audience’s attention. <BR>
<BR>
• Student also incorporated excellent usage of audio features such as sound effects and/or music.
Fair
• There is some evidence of creativity in some of the ideas but not consistent throughout animation. <BR>
<BR>
• Good use of originality and inventiveness.<BR>
<BR>
• Animation offers new insights and captures audience’s attention.
Poor
• Creativity is lacking as it is evident that student took the quickest and easiest route in creating the animation. <BR>
<BR>
• There is little evidence of thought or inventiveness. Animation does not capture audience.
Animation: Frame Speed/Timing
Good
• The overall animation/frame speed is very well paced to enable clear viewing. <BR>
<BR>
• Completes the project well in advance of the allowed class time.
Fair
• The animation is good, though frame speeds seem to either drag on OR need to be slightly longer to address. <BR>
<BR>
• Completes the project within the class time allowed.
Poor
• The animation seems to be in need of more editing on frame speed. <BR>
<BR>
• Student rushes to complete the project within the class time allowed.
Keywords:
animation
Subjects:
Computers
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.