Skip to main content
iRubric: Sustainability Project rubric

iRubric: Sustainability Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Sustainability Project 
Sustainability Project
Students choose a topic, follow the research process and create a multimedia presentation.
Rubric Code: K245X5C
By krisnjer
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Sustainability
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

3 pts

Needs improvement

1 pts

Research/notetaking/planning

Excellent

Note cards/graphic organizer indicates you accurately researched a variety of information sources, recorded and interpreted significant facts, meaningful graphics, accurate sounds.
Good

Notes show you recorded relevant information from multiple sources of information, evaluated and synthesized relevant information.
Needs improvement

Notes show you misinterpreted statements, graphics and questions and failed to identify relevant arguments.
Content

Excellent

Content is written clearly and concisely with a logical sequence of ideas and supporting information.

The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Information is accurate and current.
Good

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose.

Includes few facts. Some of the information may not seem to fit.

Sources used appear unreliable.
Needs improvement

Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Includes little information - only one or two facts about the topic.

Information is incomplete, out of date and/or incorrect.
Writing Mechanics

Excellent

The text is written with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling
Good

The text is clearly written with little or no editing required for grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Needs improvement

Spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors distract or impair readability.
(3 or more errors)
Layout

Excellent

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings and white space.
Good

The layout shows structure, but some elements appear cluttered, busy or distracting with gaps of white space or uses a distracting background.
Needs improvement

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings and subheadings to enhance the readability.
Text Elements

Excellent

The fonts are easy-to-read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

Use of italics, bold, and indentations enhances readability.

The background and colors enhance the readability of text.
Good

Sometimes the fonts are easy-to-read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, color or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
Needs improvement

Overall readability is difficult due to inappropriate contrasting colors, poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting.
Pictures/illustrations/sounds

Excellent

You have included more than 3 meaningful pictures/illustrations to support your research information. Photo credits included.

Images are proper size and resolution, and all images enhance the content.
Good

You have included 3 pictures/illustrations to support your research information. Graphics are relevant. Photo credits included.

Most images are proper size, resolution.
Needs improvement

You have included 1 to 2 pictures/illustrations to support your research information. Graphics may lack relevance. Photo credits not included.

Graphics/sounds do not enhance understanding of the content, or are distracting decorations that create a busy feeling and detract from the content.

Images are too large/small in size, poorly cropped or color/resolution is fuzzy.
Timeliness/neatness

Excellent

The writer/creator has completed the prewriting part of the assignment on time, and the assignment is done neatly.
Good

The writer/creator has not turned the prewriting part of the assignment in on time, OR the assignment is not done neatly - i.e. crumpled, stained, poorly erased.
Needs improvement

The writer/creator has not turned the prewriting part of the assignment in on time, AND the assignment is not done neatly - i.e. crumpled, stained, poorly erased.
Citations

Excellent

Sources of information/photos are properly cited so that the audience can determine the credibility and authority of the information presented.

All sources of information are clearly identified and credited.
Good

Most sources of information/photos are documented to make it possible to check on the accuracy of information.
Needs improvement

No way to check source of information.



Keywords:
  • non-fiction multimedia



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16