Skip to main content
iRubric: Web Design Client Project: Summative Assessment rubric

iRubric: Web Design Client Project: Summative Assessment rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Web Design Client Project: Summative Assessment 
Web Design Client Project: Summative Assessment
The student will create a minimum 6 page web site that meets the requirements of the Web Design Client Project. Students will have a home page (named index.html) plus five other pages. The students will choose a client for whom to create the web site.
Rubric Code: JX9347A
By sdlutenants
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric HTML Web Page
  Exemplary

4 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Emerging/Developing

2 pts

Below Standard

1 pts

Student Self Assessment

Circle the appropriate area on the continuum. Below write a justification and provide specific supporting evidence from the project.

0 pts

Layout/Design
20 %

Exemplary

The web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout and page templates have been utilized. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.
Proficient

The web site has an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements and page templates have been utilized.
Emerging/Developing

The web site has a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements and page templates have been utilized.
Below Standard

The web site has a cluttered look and is confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements and page templates have not been utilized.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
Navigation
10 %

Internal/External Links
Exemplary

Links for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages and take reader where he expects to go. A user does not become lost.
Proficient

Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from page to page and internal links take the reader where he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Emerging/Developing

Links for navigation are the reader where expected, but some needed links seem to be missing or broken. A user sometimes gets lost.
Below Standard

Some links do not take the reader to the sites/pages described. A user typically feels lost.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
Content
10 %

Exemplary

Content is appropriate for the project and complete with no major eliminations.
Proficient

Content is appropriate for the project with moderate eliminations.
Emerging/Developing

Content is appropriate but incomplete in some areas.
Below Standard

Content is inappropriate or of insufficient quantity as to make the web site inefficient.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
Graphics
10 %

Exemplary

Graphics are related to the theme or purpose of the site, are of high quality, appropriately sized and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Proficient

Graphics are related to the theme or purpose of the site, are of good quality, some are appropriately sized and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Emerging/Developing

Graphics are of fair design, unoriginal, poorly sized with elements that need enhancing.
Below Standard

Graphics are poor design, unoriginal or borrowed work that need major enhancements.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
Cascading Style Sheet
10 %

Exemplary

Student uses an external cascading style sheet which is successfully attached to all pages, which makes all pages attractive looking and consistent.
Proficient

Student uses an external cascading style sheet that is attached to all pages, however, there is some inconsistencies in relation to the styles on each page in the web site.
Emerging/Developing

Student uses a style sheet, however, it is not attached to all pages, which disrupts consistency of pages within the web site.
Below Standard

Student fails to use a style sheet within the pages of the web site.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
Color Choices
5 %

Exemplary

Color choices are related to the project and appropriate for the theme/purpose of the site. Contrast is appealing and eye catching.
Proficient

Color choices are related to the project and appropriate for the theme/purpose of the site. Color choices have moderate errors with most areas blending appropriately.
Emerging/Developing

Color choices have a few errors with some areas not blending appropriately.
Below Standard

Color choices are loud and competing with each other as to distract the reader.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
Work Ethic
10 %

Exemplary

Student always uses classroom project time well. Conversations are primarily focused on the project and things needed to get the work done and are held in a manner that typically does not discrupt others.
Proficient

Student usually uses classroom project time well. Most conversations are focused on the project and things needed to get the work done and are held in a manner that typically does not disrupt others.
Emerging/Developing

Student usually uses classroom project time well, but occasionally distracts others from their work. Attendance has poor and attempts to make an effort to make up their work.
Below Standard

Student does not use classroom project time well OR typically is disruptive to the work of others.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
MUGS
5 %

Mecanics, Usage, Grammar, Spelling
Exemplary

There are no errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar in the final draft of the web site.
Proficient

There are 1-3 spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors in the final draft of the web site.
Emerging/Developing

There are 4-5 spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors in the final draft of the web site.
Below Standard

There are more than 6 spelling, punctuation, or grammar errors in the final draft of the web site.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
Self-Assessment
10 %

Exemplary

The self assessment was completed on time. Well articulated and thorough justifications were provided. Detailed evidence was provided to support the justification.
Proficient

The self assessment was completed. Adequate justifications were provided. Evidence was provided to support the justification, but lacked detail.
Emerging/Developing

The self assessment was completed. Justifications are weak and lacking in evidence.
Below Standard

The self assessment was attempted. Justifications/Evidence is incomplete or missing.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:
The Process
10 %

Exemplary

Student completed all the necessary forms throughout the project. All of the weekly goals were written, completed and submitted on time.
Proficient

Student completed all of the necessary forms throughout the project. The majority of the weekly goals were written, completed and submitted on time.
Emerging/Developing

Student completed some of the necessary forms throughout the project. Some of the weekly goals were written, completed and submitted on time.
Below Standard

Student did not complete all the necessary forms throughout the project. The majority of the weekly goals were late or incomplete.
Student Self Assessment

Justification:




Evidence:




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98