Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Candy Debate: Skittles Vs Starburst rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Candy Debate: Skittles Vs Starburst
Rubric Code:
JX6C6B2
By
lcann249
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Candy Debate
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Needs Work
1 pts
Opening Statement
Excellent
Opening Statement:
The team’s opening statement contains all the elements necessary
--Hook
--Preview of arguments
--Nod to other side
--Concluding sentence
Excellent opening statements are very passionate, attention-getting, and informative at the same time
Good
Opening statement contains all of the elements necessary:
--Hook
--Preview of arguments
--Nod to other side
--Concluding sentence
Good opening statements have passion, and are mostly successful at grabbing attention (but could use more striking statements.) The opener remains informative.
Fair
Opening statement contains most of the necessary elements, but may be missing or skimming over one or two requirements:
--Hook
--Preview of arguments
--Nod to other side
--Concluding sentence
Fair opening statements lack some passion, and have some trouble catching the audience's attention. The opening may not be as informative as the audience needs to anticipate what will come next in arguments.
Needs Work
Opening statement contains very few or none of the necessary requirements:
--Hook
--Preview of arguments
--Nod to other side
--Concluding sentence
Opening statements that need more work lack passion and have difficulty catching the audience's attention. The opening is not as informative as the audience needs, and the audience will not be able to predict any upcoming arguments.
Arguments
Excellent
All arguments have the appropriate argument parts, and each part is presented clearly and factually.
--Obvious evidence of premises/assertions
--Obvious evidence of conclusion drawn from assertions
Conclusions drawn from assertions are extremely logical and well-thought-out. All claims are factual and are drawn from reputable sources.
Good
All arguments have the appropriate argument parts, and each part is presented clearly and factually.
--There is evidence of premises/assertions
--There is evidence of conclusion drawn from assertions
Conclusions drawn from assertions are logical and thought-out, but a little more clarification could make the connection obvious. Most claims are factual and are drawn from reputable sources.
Fair
Some arguments have the appropriate argument parts, though these parts are difficult to observe
--limited evidence of premises/assertions
--Limited evidence of conclusion drawn from assertions
Conclusions drawn from assertions have limited reasoning behind them. Some claims are, at the heart, factual, but the source of the claim is questionable
Needs Work
Few or no arguments have the appropriate argument parts, and those that do are confusing to the audience.
--There is little to no evidence of conclusion drawn from assertions
Conclusions are confusing or unclear as to how they were drawn, and claims are either questionable or totally unfactual.
Rebuttal
Excellent
Excellent rebuttals oppose the claims brought up by the other team with factual arguments/rebuttal. The rebuttal fully contradicts the points the opposite team came up with and yet is adequate to keep opinions of the opposing team and their arguments positive and valid. Rebuttals are used as an attack on the arguments made by the other team, rather than the team itself.
Good
Good rebuttals oppose the claims brought up by the other team with factual arguments/rebuttal. The rebuttal mostly contradicts the points the opposite team came up with and mostly keeps a positive outlook on the views of the other team, though some jabs are present. Rebuttals are mostly used as an attack on the arguments made by the other team, rather than the team itself.
Fair
Fair rebuttals oppose the claims brought up by the other team with some facts, but mostly with unsubstantiated claims. The rebuttal somewhat contradicts the points the opposite team came up with, though some of the Rebuttals are used as a negative attack on the other team.
Needs Work
Rebuttals that need work either do not oppose claims from the other side at all, or they rebut with wild, and unsubstantiated claims. The rebuttal hardly contradicts the points the opposite team came up with, and those points that attempt are negative and attacking.
Closing Statement
Excellent
The team’s closing statement contains all the necessary elements:
--Rehook
--Review of points
--Takeaway statement
The closing statement is passionate, and it connects the audience even more with the debate which just occurred. Excellent closing statements best wrap up the debate and leave a memorable and convincing message for the main argument being challenged.
Good
The team’s closing statement contains all the necessary elements:
--Rehook
--Review of points
--Takeaway statement
The closing statement is mostly passionate, and it connects the audience with the debate which just occurred. Good closing statements wrap up the debate and leave some kind of message about the main argument presented, though a more powerful message could have been used.
Fair
The team’s closing statement contains Some of the necessary elements:
--Rehook
--Review of points
--Takeaway statement
The closing statement is somewhat passionate, though it may not leave the audience with a memorable experience with the debate. Fair closing statements attempt to leave a lasting message about the arguments made, but the message is unclear or falls flat.
Needs Work
The team’s closing statement is missing some or most of the necessary elements:
--Rehook
--Review of points
--Takeaway statement
The closing statement lacks passion and has very little memorable content. The audience is left feeling somewhat underwhelmed by the debate and/or the candy by the end of the closing statement.
Presentation
Excellent
Excellent debates are presented with obvious interest and investment from the members involved.
Body movement and posture shows engagement, and is appropriate to a formal speech.
Vocal presentation is clear, articulate, and loud enough for the audience to understand all of the points being presented.
Eye contact is given to the audience in appropriate measure.
Good
Good debates are presented with interest and investment from the members involved.
Body movement and posture shows some engagement, and is appropriate to a formal speech, though a more engaging stance or movement could amp things up.
Vocal presentation is mostly clear and articulate, though volume or passionate speech could be improved.
Eye contact is given to the audience in good measure, but tends to stick more on the opposing team or the speaking aids.
Fair
Fair debates are presented with limited interest and investment from the members involved.
Body movement and posture shows limited engagement.
Vocal presentation is somewhat clear, though a louder voice or more passion is needed to be more appealing
Eye contact is sometimes given to the audience, but the gaze lingers for long periods of time on notes or the other team.
Needs Work
Debates that need work are presented with almost no interest or engagement by the members involved. Body movement and posture shows boredom or disengagement.
Vocal presentation is unclear, too quiet, or monotone.
Eye contact is rarely given to the audience.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.