- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Modified SWH Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Modified SWH Rubric Modified SWH Rubric Revised for 8th grade Rubric Code: JX65B3W By knightcsas Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Science Type: Writing Grade Levels: 6-8

Modified SWH Rubric
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Content & Development	Poor -Little to no description of beginning ideas -Missing hypothesis and independent and dependent variables -Beginning question is lacking meaning.	Fair -Hypothesis and variables are included but are incorrect or lacking meaning. -Beginning question is stated. -No testing procedure.	Good -Hypothesis and variables are included and are correct. -Beginning question has some amount of detail. -Lacking testing procedure.	Excellent -Thorough hypothesis and variables listed. -Beginning question goes into great detail. -Shows understanding of what will be tested.
Observations & Claims	Poor -No graph is included -Brief explanation of discoveries are mentioned.	Fair -Graph is included, but explanation of graph is missing. -Short discription of observations are mentioned briefly.	Good -Labeled graph is included. -Description is listed and somewhat well explained, but is missing a few key points.	Excellent -Neat, organized, labeled graph is included and explained. -Observations are written in a clear and concise manner.
Evidence	Poor -Little to no evidence is included.	Fair -Some evidence is present, but lacks validity and reliability	Good -Evidence is present, but lacking true meaning. -Evidence goes into a decent amount of detail.	Excellent -Evidence, from the graph, is clearly explained and reflected upon. -Evidence makes sense and is able to be proved.
Reflection	Poor -Little to no reflection is present. -Shows no sign of new ideas from tests performed.	Fair -Reflection is present but consists of one or two sentences, lacking depth. -Lacks description of new ideas.	Good -Reflection shows an understanding of the experiment. -Includes evidence from one other source. -One or two new ideas are explored, but not explained.	Excellent -Shows a vast understanding of what was tested. -Backs up evidence with reading from at least two sources. -Meaningful reflection and explanation of ideas of the test after results have been found.