- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Critical Thinking Presentations rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Critical Thinking Presentations CT Presentations Year 9 EAL Rubric Code: JX3X8A7 By masonj11 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Humanities Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

CT Presentations Rubric
	Needs Developing 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Title and Presentation	Needs Developing The presentation referred to an issue but it was irrelevant to the skills used at the time	Good The presentation referred to an issue that was somewhat current, lead to multiple perspectives, was interesting and quite engaging.	Excellent The presentation referred to an issue that was very current, stimulated a high degree of discussion and interest and was very engaging.
RAVEN	Needs Developing The presentation showed some understanding of RAVEN. One or possible two parts are mentioned superficially. More depth could have been used.	Good The presentation showed a confident understanding of RAVEN with two or more of the RAVEN being explained and explored in greater detail.	Excellent The Presentation showed an exemplary understanding of RAVEN with the full range of Critical Thinking criteria discussed at relevant times during the presentation.
Connections	Needs Developing The presentation explored 2 different perspectives to some extent.	Good The Presentation explored at least 2 different perspectives and accounted for the similarities and differences, with a reasoned judgment.	Excellent As well as the good comments, the Presentation gave a clear and detailed account of how the issue could be explored from different perspectives.
Knower's Perspective	Needs Developing The arguments used showed limited explanation and examples. There was little evidence to back up the claims	Good The arguments used showed were well explained and supported with examples and there was some personal involvement in the topic.	Excellent The arguments used showed a deeply personal involvement in the topic. All arguments were clearly developed and well explained.