- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Session Intervention Plan rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Session Intervention Plan Observation Report This rubric aims to serve as a guideline to strengthen clinical writing skills across practica in SLP. Rubric Code: JX37CC3 By ProfMCarter Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Learning Outcomes
	Unsatisfactory 0-2 (N/A)	Reasonable 3-7 (N/A)	Fit for approval 8-10 (N/A)
STO	Unsatisfactory Missing 1+ components of an objective beyond the condition; does NOT match the procedure	Reasonable Missing the condition component of the objective	Fit for approval Complete with ALL components; matches the proposed procedure
Antecedent	Unsatisfactory No discussion of stimuli for eliciting target behavior	Reasonable Partial discussion of stimuli for eliciting target behavior	Fit for approval Complete discussion of stimuli for eliciting target behavior; directions for how the skill will be presented
Response	Unsatisfactory No discussion of client response to target behavior	Reasonable Partial discussion of client response to target behavior	Fit for approval Complete discussion of client response (cx expectation) to target behavior
Consequent Event	Unsatisfactory Missing discussion for how the cx will respond to the client's response and reinforcement type/schedule; similarities to branching/scaffolding plan	Reasonable Partial discussion for what the cx will do in response to client response; reinforcement type and schedule; NO similarities to branching/scaffolding plan	Fit for approval Complete discussion for what the cx will do in response to client response; reinforcement type and schedule; NO similarities to branching/scaffolding plan
Failure Criterion	Unsatisfactory Mirrors the pass criterion	Reasonable Allows for adjustments within reason	Fit for approval Flexible; Allows for adjustments for the client to feel success
Tally	Unsatisfactory Incomplete notation system; difficult to follow for peer reviewer; difficult for cx to interpret data	Reasonable Partial notation system (tally + 1 add'l descriptor); reasonable to follow	Fit for approval Comprehensive notation system (tally, supports, notes, etc.); easy to follow for peer reviewer; easy to interpret data for cx
Branching	Unsatisfactory Missing discussion for depth AND scope of individual skill for one or both task difficulties	Reasonable Partial discussion of either depth OR scope of individual skill for one or both task difficulties	Fit for approval Complete discussion of depth AND scope of individual skill for both task difficulties
Rationale	Unsatisfactory Missing discussion of 2+ EBP components; Does not directly discuss the client/patient individual needs	Reasonable Missing discussion of 1 EBP component	Fit for approval Discussion for all 3 EBP components that include direct implications for the client/patient individual needs